jimsimmons

10 ms·

61.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
How will equity and compensation work AI peeps are not cheap
62.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Hot new startup just dropped:MSFT
63.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
But they put the effort to create it and others recollect it?
64.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
If Altman can use populism and VC pressure to overturn board decisions what is the point of OpenAI lol
65.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Didn't read it as dismissive. Frames it as ambitious even
66.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Paywall
67.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Why group the two women together? Not that I think either are competent
68.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Insanely based take. Sam tries to sound smart while not really having any technical insight. He does a tremendous job with it though. One way to think about this is: at some point in the next few years we'll have a few hundred GPUs&#x2
69.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Sergey is pretty involved according to recent reports
70.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
So I can use his pic to promote any private business I want? That brazenly and without permission?
71.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Why was the PM advertising for a 3rd party wallet? The goal of demonetisation has never been clear. It was a thuglaq move and Indian right wing has retro fitted motivations to it.
72.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
The day after demonetisation was announced every news paper in India carried a front page ad with the PM batting for Chinese backed PayTM. The UPI revolution happened despite Modi, not because of him in the slightest.
73.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
This project is a great example of subliminal marketing. It is less apparent now but still, the repeated flex of “Google”, 20% project etc when no typical reader would assume them is classic corporate charlatanry. Shame because I like the p
74.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
They’re asking training data details. Really curious to see how this turns out
75.
We haven't made GPT-4 dumber. Quite the opposite(twitter.com)
5 points by jimsimmons 3y ago|1 comments
76.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
A lot of people trying to sign up probably. This degrades performance of one part of the system that is generally not highly optimised. This permeates everywhere
77.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
One is for stack allocated objects and the other for heap
78.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Not sure why you’re downvoted
79.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
You can collapse all positions beyond a length to a specific bucket like T5
80.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
DL practitioner for a decade here: The OP doesn’t explain anything. It just vaguely talks about a few things that might break when scaling context. But that means nothing. Take for example sinusoidal embeddings they talk about. Of course it
81.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Gah. You’d think people would’ve learnt to not fall for such things by now
82.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
wouldn’t surprise me if he has like 8 alt accounts here and on Twitter
83.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
You have zero innovations promoting quality.
84.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
You’re again confusing being large with being more predatory. There are more mosquitoes than tigers
85.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
What drama. Ooc
86.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Question is who is more predatory not who makes more money
87.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Windows is free. MSFT is literally siphoning data from your personal devices. You’re speaking on an agenda without accounting for reality
88.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Except that posts like this should change your beliefs towards who the biggest privacy invader really is
89.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Market cap. They’ve the most money and enjoy highest PE ratio
90.
by jimsimmons 3y ago
Palantir is Infosys for governments. This remark is a psyop by Karp to make them seem like some frontier CS place.

More ›