jimbofisher1

8 ms·

61.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
I'm sorry where did I imply they were already safer? I think it's obvious they will continue to improve and surpassing human level is not far away.
62.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
Considering around 1/3 of students at schools like Harvard are Legacy Admits who would never otherwise get admitted on their merits, I don't think your argument holds much weight. You seem to be admitting that they are selecting f
63.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
Don't understand the hang up about this. Self Driving cars were always going to kill people. It's not possible to be 100% safe but even a minute improvement over human drivers would save thousands of lives a year.
64.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
>materialist consumerism: something millennials want no part of. You must have missed Instagram... Consumerism is alive and well among millenials. Remember not everyone is a HN reader who works in IT...
65.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
I'm not going to cry for Shaw if he wastes his money. He has mountains of it...
66.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
https://register.epo.org/documentView?number=US.2017058046.W... Read the applications for yourself. I'm not a patent lawyer but they seem to be unbelievably broad.
67.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
This is extremely concerning. Processing sequences using CNNs is particularly bad. It covers using CNNs to process ANY sequences, text, audio, video, etc.. Basically covering any potential use for a CNN. This would like a company patenting
68.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
Given HN's recent bashing of Google for abandoning it's Don't be Evil mantra this seems like a rather absurd position to take. "Google totes won't abuse this at all!"
69.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
The supreme court has ruled that Corporations are people. So why wouldn't it extend to corporations?
70.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
https://blog.keras.io/building-powerful-image-classification... This is a good start
71.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
"According to researchers from Credit Suisse, the richest 1% owned 50.8% of the world’s wealth in 2016" That should be a wake up call.
72.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
Sure and I bet you could find a $500/mo room in a crack house. Doesn't mean a working professional would be willing to live there. Frankly a realistic number is $3000/mo for a 1BR and my point is that you could own an incredi
73.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/ Its totally not because the 1% has captured all the value created by increased productivity over the past 50 years. Definitely not.
74.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
What adult is paying 2k in rent in SV, with 4 roommates that may be possible... If you want to live like that fine but most of America can afford to buy a substantial house for 2k a month.
75.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
Aww how cute, the CEO defends paying his employees 50,000 while he makes 10,000,000. "Its just jealousy folks!" I'm sure Louis XVI was thinking the same thing right before the public summarily removed his head from his body.
76.
by jimbofisher1 8y ago
Because they are also CEOs at large companies and also want bloated salaries so they approve them for their counterparts.