jillyboel

20 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   Yep, this is why I'm not a fan of WASM. It's going to make debugging/reversing webapps much, much harder while that has always been one of the charms of the web.
2. 272.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   > I once wanted to submit a wrapper but got an angry response link?
3. 273.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   Is this actually legal to do? Sounds like jamming.
4. 274.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   Because the EU wants its member countries to care about the climate, even though it's completely overshadowed by the US and China not giving a shit
5. 275.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   What will the united states do? Keep shitting out CO2 with no regard to the climate?
6. 276.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   this exfiltrates data somehow? looking forward to the poc
7. 277.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   do you have a proof of concept that uses webgpu shaders to extract sensitive data?
8. 278.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   What? They even provided a benchmarking tool. You should be ecstatic at users providing such detailed reports. Most projects just attract reports that go like "its slow, fix it!!111"
9. 279.▲
   by jillyboel 2y ago

   Sure, what does that have to do with third parties scraping shit and training their models on it? Which is exactly how these ai bros started their empire? These terms of services were updated after the genie was out of the bottle. Claimin
10. 280.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    All I'm seeing is a paywall. Of course I'm not going to pay for access to some american news paper, since I'm not an american. Anyway if he didn't ask them for permission then that is very gross, yes.
11. 281.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    I don't like bad comments like this.
12. 282.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    As if these ai bros give a fuck? No terms of services mentioned AI but they scraped everything and built their fortunes from it. Also are you sure that the TOS of the major websites specify "we allow anyone that runs a scraper to use y
13. 283.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    Because the goal is to replace you with a machine and to widen the poverty gap. Also because I do not consent to it. Are you also fine with taking pictures of pretty women on the street (hey, they'd be walking there anyway) and posting
14. 284.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    I live in "the West" but English isn't my main language. I have no idea what a conoid is.
15. 285.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    I'm not an american, 200k/year is practically unheard of in the EU lol
16. 286.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    > people were getting yelled at by leadership this is where you get up and leave
17. 287.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    That's awesome! Unfortunately it's all "request a quote". Can you shed some light on how much you paid?
18. 288.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    Must be nice to be stinking rich
19. 289.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    Kill four innocent civilians and all that happened was one of the killers was "severely reprimanded"
20. 290.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    You literally started by calling them scummy. That is an implicit demand for change.
21. 291.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    The point is they're not misrepresenting anything, you just don't seem to understand open source. Literally all of them have the same disclaimer, and obviously they're not going to make any guarantees to randos who haven&#x27
22. 292.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    I suppose it's best if you never use any open source software ever again because they all do that. Like I said, it's standard boilerplate and it's absurd to think you get to wish for more from an open source project t
23. 293.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    Is this the first time you heard of open source licenses or something? This is standard boilerplate, and it's hilarious to think you get to ask for more from a project you're not even contributing to.
24. 294.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    This is for killing people, right?
25. 295.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    It's more about queries like (dummy example) RETURN CASE WHEN a = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 2 END; where it insists on aligning WHEN past CASE. I think it would be perfectly reasonable to indent WHEN
26. 296.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    i think the idea sql prettifier is pretty silly sometimes. it really likes indenting stuff to make sure things are aligned, which often results in dozens of whitespaces
27. 297.▲
    by jillyboel 2y ago

    what is your prettifier of choice for postgres?