jijijijij

12 ms·

91.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
> Any advance could be dismissed as "case-specific", couldn't it? and > If by "counting" you mean the "counting r's" issue, that's a tokenisation artifact (the models are blind to individua
92.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
> The previous answers all restate the problem as "Work is force dot/times distance". But this is not really satisfying, because you could then ask "Why is work force dot distance?" and the mystery is the same. .
93.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
It doesn't matter where we draw the line, or what someone else said at some point. I merely pointed out your argument wasn't a sound rebuttal. Criticizing subjective experiences to assess the situation is, but that cuts both ways.
94.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
"Otherwise". If the craftsman revenue isn't enough to recover the investment expenses, the business is operating at loss. But that's beside the point, because research investments are not the issue at hand. As said befor
95.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say.
96.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
> Just because there's time between big releases doesn't mean progress stopped. No, but progress not stopping doesn't mean it's not plateauing. I believe 'plateauing' is understood as the process of approac
97.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Well, then you also have to assume higher expectations put on commercial offers raising operational costs. So, your objection really is a moot point.
98.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Great, but that's only a part of operational costs. A craftsman's revenue may exceed the electricity bill for the power drill, doesn't mean the business is sustainable.
99.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Is this supposed to be some sort of gotcha? Apart from research and marketing, that's operational costs. I mean, every product could be cheaper, if you didn't have to pay for employees and means of production.
100.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
> UG forces you to pay 3-4.000€ per year on tax compliance. Even in if that was true, the 25k€ difference remains (since the tax overhead is identical). Hardly what people would consider "a bit". Let's say the start capita
101.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
> which a bit less start capital. You may consider a capital stock of "at least 1€" even significantly less than 25k€. Not sure you are arguing in good faith.
102.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
German here, can confirm. Although, I don't think it's honest incompetence, but intentional corruption. Eg. public calls for bids tend to be a little too specific and politicians tend to get jobs where they funneled public money.
103.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Also dumplings, tortellini, Maultaschen, pierogi, ... Local pride across the globe, kinda boring around the world.
104.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Except when the technical capabilities prevent access??? Are you a troll?
105.
by jijijijij 4mo ago
Quite frankly, in this very instance, Europe's slow tech adaptation and comparatively little investments are a blessing. At this point, there is nothing to gain but volatility. Let the US figure out the economic and social disruption,
106.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
It's not about what I believe or not, it's about technical capabilities of the ID card.
107.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
So, then why exactly do we need an alternative?
108.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
Neither does the normal web. It became this way. The ability to run decentralized is not what is preventing enshittification. I would argue eg. a LoRa based Reticulum network is enshittification resistant, because of physical bandwidth and
109.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
The age verification with the EU ID card can be implemented without leaking any identifying information. If it's gonna be like that is questionable, but it's technically possible.
110.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
But is it resistant to enshittification?
111.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
Putting the AI in cocaine, eh?
112.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
That's moving the goal post. Fully sufficient.
113.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
The solution is easy: Recycle poop and pee. All that sweet nitrogen and phosphorous that has been DNA, ATP and protein is right there in the bowl. The problem is humans flushing all the good stuff down the toilet and into the ocean. With to
114.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
My point was the possible disconnect of productivity/yield, and efficiency. A small potato and a large potato likely need the same amount of harvesting work. Now, if you dig up finite reservoirs of phosphorous in Morocco to increase yi
115.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
> Won't super power AI tools allow companies to do more with the same number of people? Don't you think a smarter way to run a business is to capture more of the market if you have the resources to do so? For starters, because
116.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
1. That's almost 20 years old data. 2. That's just calories. Here's more recent data: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01173-4 Appears to me, like neither country is fully self-sufficient.
117.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
> 43% of workers still work in agriculture. For the US, that number is under 2%. China is at 22% as of 2023, and dropping steadily. Don't you have to contrast these figures with import and export of produce, and environmental/e
118.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
> The physics of latency disagree fundamentally here. We just use AI to predict player actions, duh?!
119.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
> This is what's gonna make cloud gaming really take off. Hypepunk at the dawn of silicon gothic.
120.
by jijijijij 5mo ago
Are you telling me I only have to wait just a little longer and the GPU are going to be really, really cheap?

More ›