jibal

26 ms·

541.
by jibal 8mo ago
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/200282/explaining-...
542.
by jibal 8mo ago
I have trouble believing that haughty slop wasn't written by an AI.
543.
by jibal 8mo ago
They are semantically identical: "you're wrong" is shorthand for "what you said is wrong" ... it is definitely not ad hominem .
544.
by jibal 8mo ago
Yes, seems clear, right? It was an extremely hostile pompous criticism of something he didn't understand at all, and the questions were rhetorical, not asked sincerely or in good faith: > Is this a “this dev” thing, a Zig thing, or
545.
by jibal 8mo ago
P.S. I'm not wrong. Perhaps someone got confused about what "suffix" means.
546.
by jibal 8mo ago
P.S. As for the naysayer: The C code does a lot more than run elisp. e.g., memory management/GC, display and I/O, primitives/built-in functions/subrs, system services. Even if you interpret emacs strictly as an interpret
547.
by jibal 8mo ago
This article isn't about reimplementing emacs. BTW emacs is written in C.
548.
by jibal 8mo ago
There was no mention of ~foo
549.
by jibal 8mo ago
The HN title is factually incorrect. As the article's title and text state, it was Florida's specific law that was declared unconstitutional, and not because of red light cameras.
550.
by jibal 8mo ago
Yes. The appalling level of ignorance in the comments here and failure to understand the article is disturbing and a little scary ... hopefully it won't get in the way of actually simplifying and unifying the language, generalizing spe
551.
by jibal 8mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
552.
by jibal 8mo ago
That simply isn't true.
553.
by jibal 8mo ago
You guessing, based on an overgeneralization of "too heavy" (the context was quite explicitly opening a single file outside the Obsidian vault--nothing about electron), that it isn't what they're looking for provides no
554.
by jibal 8mo ago
Here's one: https://github.com/marktext/marktext There are other suggestions at https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1023abr/what_is_the_...
555.
by jibal 8mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
556.
by jibal 8mo ago
That's quite the non sequitur . The relationship you mention isn't why COBOL is legacy.
557.
by jibal 8mo ago
Well, that's not the way context works and it's dishonest BS. You wrote "You got downvoted a bit but I upvoted. You're clearly being descriptive in your statements, not prescriptive." -- no, they were prescriptive f
558.
by jibal 8mo ago
Wrong ... their very first words were "Isn’t it actually quite fair ..."
559.
by jibal 8mo ago
It's not semantic nonsense, it's the truth per the incident reports ... go read the links that have been added up top.
560.
by jibal 8mo ago
The facts are not made up--check the incident reports. Most claims of LLM authorship are erroneous.
561.
by jibal 8mo ago
Wikipedia is not under attack. Some stupid admin running with full privileges unsandboxed ran a test that grabbed and ran random user scripts, and one of them just happened to be this 2 year old malicious script.
562.
by jibal 8mo ago
The worm is a two year old script from the Russian Wiki that was grabbed randomly for a test by a stupid admin running unsandboxed with full privileges, so no.
563.
by jibal 8mo ago
Kudos for very polite responses to trolling.
564.
by jibal 8mo ago
See also https://www.usmcu.edu/Portals/218/War%20Prayer%2C%20Mark%20T...
565.
by jibal 8mo ago
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/wilfred-owen
566.
by jibal 8mo ago
I didn't miss that you totally changed the subject and now you're attacking a strawman. See Steve Klabnick's response to your other comment where you did this. Of course macros are good for encapsulation and abstraction, but
567.
by jibal 8mo ago
Excellent goalpost moving! Congratulations!
568.
by jibal 8mo ago
People? You mentioned one person (who won a Darwin Award--hopefully he hadn't already bred). P.S. As for the absurd response, the assertion was > People in the U.S. are simply constructed differently and a handwaving reference to
569.
by jibal 8mo ago
> It did not work in the US What didn't? > and resulted Correlation is not causation.
570.
by jibal 8mo ago
Why are you talking about support? The article has nothing to do with that.

More ›