Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jibal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
421.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
2^512 is the number of distinct values of 512 bits ... it sure seems to succeed in existing. SHA-512 is a cryptographic hash that depends on that.
422.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
From the comments: The notion of "believing in" axioms is absurd ... as absurd as believing in the rules of chess and disbelieving the rules of checkers. Each set of rules or axioms forms a system (possibly degenerate if the axiom
423.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
> μpb (often written 'upb') is a small protobuf implementation written in C.
424.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
I only gave the definition from cerebralfaith ... I didn't read their example, which I agree is bogus. My mistake for including that reference without reading the rest. > I’m by default disposition suspicious of fallacies that are n
425.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Loris Cro banned me from his Zig forum because I disagreed with/corrected something he wrote. I was also blocked from the Zig github repository, after being a frequent contributor to issue discussions, for reasons unknown (I was never
426.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
https://finmasters.com/ad-hoc-fallacy/ > Ad hoc fallacy is a fallacious rhetorical strategy in which a person presents a new explanation – that is unjustified or simply unreasonable – of why their original belief or
427.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
It's exhausting to see such unoriginal comments. This language has original features and clearly was not vibe coded ... the author is primarily a Zig programmer, and Zig has a very anti-AI culture.
428.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Look at the author's repositories. He writes mostly in Zig, which has a very anti-AI culture. There's no evidence of AI in rip-lang, just lots of hard work.
429.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
They can't, of course ... especially when they clearly never looked at it. Very nice work!
430.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
And that is grossly dishonest ... my original comment said nothing about what is true for me, and I never assumed (or assume) that what is true of me is true of others. In fact the whole point of my comment that you are responding to here i
431.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Because the author acted on that comment.
432.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions
433.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
"grue" has a specific meaning in philosophy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_riddle_of_induction
434.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
But color isn't a spectrum of light. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/color/
435.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
define "experience the same way" There's a philosophical school of thought (which I share) that there's no coherent definition.
436.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Consensus in science has nothing to do with voting. It's a consequence, not a cause, and arises when the accumulated evidence is clear enough and unambiguous enough that there is general agreement among experts in the field--that is, t
437.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
This is quite false and the opposite of what is actually true. Textbooks and other teaching materials are entirely based on consensus science, surveys report on consensus, meta-analyses identify consensus, the abstracts of novel studies lay
438.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
I admire your creativity, willpower, and work ethic, and a few other things about you, but I don't admire reactionary garbage like this ... I'm actually rather shocked by it and how it leans heavily on the strawman "I'm
439.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Of course science is consensus based ... consensus is a fundamental part of the scientific process, which is conducted by a community of scientists. Consensus is the end result of attempts at reproducibility and falsification, of the ongoin
440.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
No it isn't and that clickbait article doesn't say it is.
441.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
To clarify, my statement was based on comments I have seen and heard from Andrew Kelley when discussing this subject. I can't locate those at the moment, but here is https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39156426 by mlu
442.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
No, the whole point is to eliminate dependencies that they have to maintain. "not obligate" really doesn't mean anything if it's available as a backend--the obligation is on the Zig developers to keep it working, and t
443.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Fitbit Inspire3 ?
444.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
The location of the Earth is completely irrelevant. "closer" and "farther" refer to the center of the galaxy.
445.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Earth isn't relevant. The stars at the center of the galaxy developed first, and development proceeded from the inside out, so the youngest stars are on the edge ... then they get older from there on out, as the stars beyond the edge b
446.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
You seem to be a fundamentally dishonest person.
447.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
I made no assumptions. Or if my "It's wild" makes assumptions, then surely your "That's wild" does as well. But really, neither do--they are simply expressions of a disparity between fact and expectation or des
448.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Not that way, you won't. As I noted, those are completely different assertions, and the one you actually made is a lie.
449.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
It's not objectively false, people just can't read. > the high-caliber hurricanes that, before climate change, didn’t come to the Ridge
450.
▲
by
jibal
6mo ago
Which people? And no, it's not defined that way: "radiation having a wavelength between about 700 nanometers and 1 millimeter"
More ›