jhugo

53 ms·

751.
by jhugo 5y ago
Yeah. But I guess the distinction is quite relevant with things more complex than a hammer. For example, you are not legally entitled to return a camera because you thought it could shoot in 3D and it couldn't, unless the advertising f
752.
by jhugo 5y ago
He's not past that point; he hasn't accepted the new terms yet. Did you read the OP?
753.
by jhugo 5y ago
"Works as you expect it to" is not the same thing as "fit for purpose". The purpose of a hammer is (mostly) an objective fact. Your expectations of what the hammer can do, on the other hand, may or may not be reasonable.
754.
by jhugo 5y ago
That's absurd. If you buy something in a store you may never have visited the website of the manufacturer. It's not fit for purpose if you need to agree to a new contract, the terms of which were not disclosed to you before you ma
755.
by jhugo 5y ago
If I walk into a store and buy something and they never mention the surprise extra contractual terms I need to go looking for on the website, then those surprise extra contractual terms aren't part of the sales contract. He's enti
756.
by jhugo 5y ago
Anyone can post it if they want to. If it gets enough upvotes it will be on the front page for a while, just like this one...
757.
by jhugo 5y ago
One thing to consider is that there is now a lot of Go out there, especially in the ops world thanks to k8s, Terraform, etc. A lot of people have put a lot of effort into learning it, and may have even built their career around it. So it&
758.
by jhugo 5y ago
One goal of a project like this is to reduce the number of trucks on the road, which reduce quality of life for people living near and using the roads, regardless of what powers them.
759.
by jhugo 5y ago
> In the very guarded language of accident review I would say that is a damning indictment of the behaviour of the pilot and co-pilot as being completely reckless and bloody stupid. Well, yes, but these kind of incidents keep happening a
760.
by jhugo 5y ago
You're the only one who "sees" it because you are mistaken. The controls are still connected, as per the Boeing philosophy. Moving one moves the other, unless so much force is applied that the link opens (by design, to allow
761.
by jhugo 5y ago
To some extent, Boeing doesn't. The controls are physically linked; you can feel the other pilot moving them. In order to make opposing inputs you have to physically fight each others' inputs. It seems in this case there was may
762.
by jhugo 5y ago
The problem is the difference in level between different sources, combined with the car starting to play music from a different source when you start it up again. I have my phone playing music over Bluetooth at a normal volume (pretty quiet
763.
by jhugo 5y ago
This drone will definitely get nowhere near 30 minutes.
764.
by jhugo 5y ago
No, that's not better. If the outcomes were different, that's for reasons within their control. That's the whole point of this entire thread! There is no voodoo in self-hosting mail! You either get everything right (due dilig
765.
by jhugo 5y ago
Just to be clear, they are dumping a few grams of a relatively benign element which is regularly & safely discharged into the ocean during the normal operations of nuclear facilities worldwide, diluted in an extremely large volume of se
766.
by jhugo 5y ago
> As is known that Tritium is bioaccumulative to the point of probably acting as a persistent organic pollutant Huh? It has a half-life of 12 years.
767.
by jhugo 5y ago
> Stop running cars in areas that are easily accessible to pedestrians. There are already plenty of streets pedestrians have to use an overpass or underpass for. It's even safer and doesn't ruin the auditory environment. I agre
768.
by jhugo 5y ago
That's really bizarre. Do they think that every single trip made in the car involves loading stuff into it?
769.
by jhugo 5y ago
> If my phone's Bluetooth is connected to the car stereo, and I forget to turn off the head unit before turning off the ignition, then next time I start the car, the radio starts playing at maximum volume. I'm renting a Fiat at
770.
by jhugo 5y ago
Have you contacted Sender Support at Microsoft? They're very responsive and if your mail activity is legit they'll certainly help you solve the issue. Also make sure you set up the SNDS dashboard so you can view your IP reputation
771.
by jhugo 5y ago
I've helped friends set up mail servers fairly often, and they've had the same experience. But I wouldn't recommend DO (especially) nor AWS for this. I'd recommend a smaller, tech-savvy hosting provider that has been aro
772.
by jhugo 5y ago
That's what the word relevant means in relevant experience .
773.
by jhugo 5y ago
I guess it depends what kind of mail you're sending? I send & receive a lot of mail, but I can't imagine anyone has ever marked a mail from me as spam (except perhaps by clicking the wrong button), since it's just normal
774.
by jhugo 5y ago
> Oh, that tiny little detail where it has become impossible for almost anyone to actually send email from home, either because residential IPs are all marked as spam, or because your provider is giving you an incomplete internet connect
775.
by jhugo 5y ago
Oh, absolutely. I wouldn't recommend it casually to everyone, but if someone says "hey, I want to learn to host my own mail, but everyone tells me I shouldn't", I'm totally going to recommend they do it. If they hav
776.
by jhugo 5y ago
> when the IP range it's on becomes greylisted in UCE-PROTECT -- which happens every so often This is a common complaint with Linode specifically, but probably fairly common with low-cost virtual server providers in general. It&#x27
777.
by jhugo 5y ago
It's not exactly _hard_ on a new IP, as long as the IP is clean (which is reasonably simple to ensure, as long as your host isn't in the business of hosting spammers). You just have no reputation to start with, so you can't e
778.
by jhugo 5y ago
> When you make a claim that supposedly applies to all people, a single counterpoint is sufficient to disprove the claim. It's as if you had said "all rabbits are black", then I showed you a white rabbit to counter that no
779.
by jhugo 5y ago
"This is untrue" and yet I and others in this thread have been doing this for a long time without encountering the issue that you so confidently claim exists. My email server is used by two people. Reputation is tracked by all the
780.
by jhugo 5y ago
I'd be very surprised if I was on some kind of static whitelist from the early days of Gmail. Such a list, if it exists, would likely be reserved for much higher-volume sending IPs. I've helped others set up self hosting much more

More ›