Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jhgb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
211.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Security through celerity?
212.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> The biggest complaint I've had from companies who utilize that architecture is that I shouldn't have to run entire pre and post pipelines to make a minor change to an internal function that only affects one package in the ent
213.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> but just to point out that we were comparing gasoline plants + EV vs gasoline cars and I feel that the discussion is switching into NE plants + EV vs gasoline cars. Not sure what "NE plants" are (I'd understand that NG w
214.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> What do you think is going to be the overhead of the conversion rate to electricity, electricity transportation ? Well, for example transformers are ~98% efficient, AC lines lose around 7% per 1000 km. So with three transformers betwee
215.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Uh...when was the last time you checked on the difference between the efficiency of small and large heat engines? A large Diesel engine is going to be vastly more efficient than a small one, for example: > Passenger car diesel engines ha
216.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> If you think it's bad then why do you use it? I didn't see GP make the claim of using it?
217.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> the word autopilot is used and understood by people autside of aviation to full autotonumous driving. ...is a completely different statement from... > because of what that term means everywhere outside of aviation industry. Aviation
218.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Whether "[intercepting] headings and [changing] elevation" is meaningful improvement when the real issue is situational awareness of the automated system (which is obviously the problem with Tesla's system, or any currently
219.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
"Everywhere outside of aviation industry"? I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but I can't avoid a strong feeling that you've just made that up. Where are all the different non-aviation autopilots in the real world we l
220.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> Well, LIDAR uses very well understood physics to give you precise measurements of distance from the world around you, without any need for object recognition. It is not enough on its own, but it is an excellent safety technology. It&#x
221.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
While all of this may be true, this doesn't explain why stereoscopic vision wouldn't work where a LIDAR would. Both provide identical geometrical information and neither has anything to do with AI. Neither tells you approximate we
222.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> and will almost certainly require LIDAR to achieve any kind of safety. Is there a physical reason for that? We know that humans do just fine with just ~8cm of stereoscopic separation, and for example cars have the potential for a signi
223.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
How is this relevant? Autopilots for airplanes don't eliminate human operators. Autopilots for ships don't eliminate human operators. Tesla's autopilot doesn't eliminate human operators either. On basis of that, I would
224.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Possibly, but notice that this is not what I was responding to, which was purely the naming of the feature. So I'm not sure how this segue is relevant? Do you have anything to comment w/r to the name?
225.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
It's a very appropriate name for something that automates the long boring things while not eliminating a human operator for exciting transient things, just like in an airplane or on a ship. What about it was irresponsible? Sounds like
226.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
The page literally talks about "full self-driving capabilities [...] through software updates designed to improve functionality over time". Which to me sounds like FSD is not actually being advertised as currently existing, as opp
227.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> the last thing I need is users The Window Manager in the Glade? https://jaracimrman.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/pub-in-the-g... > The lawyer explained that my grandfather had been a notorious loner. He ste
228.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
If Zenity is not featureful enough for whatever you're trying to do, there's always Gtk-server ( https://www.gtk-server.org/intro.html ) as well.
229.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> but they mean "map" in its functional programming term We just called it "mathematical term" back in the day. :)
230.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> Their fuel is enriched far higher than terrestrial nuclear plants Which is surely one of the reasons why they generate less waste -- less non-fissile fuel to be irradiated, smaller reactor vessels to be activated, etc. Plus the average
231.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Isn't electrolysis already readily served using traditional alkaline electrolyzers? At the very least there you have the tremendous advantage of needing zero rare materials; pretty much any developed country can manufacture their own a
232.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
You know perfectly well that until Geiger counters or scintillation counters are regularly included in smartphones, people will simply not be carrying them. So, no, it's not easily detectable for the vast portion of the human populatio
233.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
But that only affects your body if you're made of money.
234.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Have you made any comparisons of your PNG files to, say, lossless WebP files? (Apparently there's also lossless mode in JPEG XS nowadays but that seems to be a very new option.)
235.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
I'd like to think, though, that today's economic connections are less replaceable than wooden stocks or steel tubes. Try replacing modern electronics with local resources when you're Russia, for example.
236.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
One can hope that RISC-V in the future will not follow ARM's past mistakes.
237.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
How is it a benefit? I somehow doubt that with the supply chains interrupted, the new owners will be anywhere as efficient at their business as their predecessors.
238.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
While it's true that SATA or NVMe would be ideal, I just recently started booting a Pi 4 straight from a Samsung T7 SSD and it's night and day compared to the SD card even over just USB. I'm sure we'll get to better inte
239.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
To my knowledge the major problem with CdTe panels has been the extremely limited availability of Te, which is probably the main reason why they're under 5% of the market today. If one expects solar power to grow even more in the futur
240.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> Used windmill blades are going to be an actual problem in the near future, but no renewable company has to buy land to hold 100 years of turbine blades or solar panels. This makes no sense. Silicon-based solar panels are almost entirel
More ›