Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jhgb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
361.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
The law I was talking about was passed in 2002, if I'm not mistaken. It specified what "remaining energy", so as to speak, would the German utilities be allowed to extract from already operating reactor units before decommiss
362.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> This is a worldwide assessment. Look at Northern Europe, and notice the complete lack of dots on the map. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here. Northern Europe generally doesn't need the kind of sites that t
363.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> Pumped hydro is already maxxed out pretty much everywhere it's possible The Australian National University recently disagreed: https://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/anu-finds-530000-potent... . But even v
364.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
The 2010 and 2012 energy efficiency directives guarantee (EU-wide, not just in Germany) that all buildings will eventually transition to low-energy buildings, but this is expected to take place by simply building new buildings to stricter c
365.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
As I pointed out above, this would not have changed anything with respect to the need to import gas from Russia. Nuclear generation is not a substitute for gas imports. Even worse, they can't "cancel their nuclear shutdown process
366.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
You're confusing German gas consumption and German electricity consumption. It couldn't escape my attention that many people especially from the US make this fatal mistake (presumably because of the prevalence of natural gas elect
367.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> Uh...Germany's actually recarbonized by shutting down their nuclear [increasing coal and imported electricity to pick up the slack]. No, they did not -- look at the fourth chart in https://www.cleanenergywire.org/f
368.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
I can't help but feel that there's some redundancy between this and CSS transformations. This is basically some kind of affine transformation of the contents of an element with additionally clipping everything that falls outside o
369.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Germany has more problems with north-south transmission lines than with places to put wind turbines in. Their windy coast would serve them perfectly well if they managed to push those transmission projects through.
370.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
I meant prison vs. jail. It seems mildly blurry to me considering that in my country we do have some distinctions between different types of detainment facilities but from what I grasped, the distinctions are delineated somewhat different
371.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
For someone from Europe...what's the exact difference?
372.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
It is practically irrelevant in the sense that you can virtually always find an acceptable place to put a wind turbine in in a several hundred kilometer radius. While there are places with very densely populated territories, there are no pl
373.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> are no longer countries, but states in the Eurozone 1) All countries are states. 2) EU countries are still countries.
374.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
I'd like to live near any power plant other than a coal-burning or biomass-burning one.
375.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
And many do not. So? Considering that you want to build very large grids to smooth over your generation (my country is a part of a synchronous grid supplying almost half a billion people with electricity), it's very hard to argue with
376.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
If pączki are anything like Czech koblihy (to which they bear an uncanny resemblance -- cf. https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobliha#/media/Soubor:Picswiss... ), then their dough is must be very different from do
377.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> that takes up 100-1000x the land Practically irrelevant unless you're Singapore or the like. > always has a few % of its installed capacity down for maintenance That's true for a nuclear power plant fleet as well. There&#x
378.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> because the industry is a regulatory hell That's weird, since many believe that the US nuclear industry is a fine example of regulatory capture.
379.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Isn't that massively stretching the definition of a "cake"? When I wrote "cake", I meant this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cake#/media/File:Pound_layer_c... -- do you put a sausage
380.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> What was logistically involved in getting ahold of one? Having a grandfather who left the country in 1968 for West Germany gifting me one when we visited him. > And what were the "legal" alternatives? Buying one at an outr
381.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> The technology stacks used on the back-end, front-end, mobile apps, and their associated tooling are most of the time very different. Which feels like a major mistake to me. My house doesn't use different construction technologies
382.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
As per Wikipedia: > In a SPA, a page refresh never occurs This is not true with something like Turbo: the partial transfer may or may not take place depending on whether it's useful to do that. The point is that you don't hav
383.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> A JSON containing the data to update a piece in the page will always be measurably smaller than the full UI There's no need to compress the full UI again. Rails' Turbo for example transfers only the minimum fragment required.
384.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> It's not hiring difficulties, people have limited time and energy to specialise. I never claimed otherwise. > but that's just extra work and higher data transfers Not necessarily. For example, when compression is being emp
385.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> Indeed, by drawing a circle around a code you change the architecture through separation of concerns and break down larger problem into smaller parts. I'm not saying "don't have cleanly separated components". I jus
386.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
The first thing I always did with any XP install was to switch to the W2k look. It saved screen space, too.
387.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
It's supposed to look like this https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol%C3%A1%C4%8D#/media/Soubor:... , but apparently in the US, some people put meat in them, when they're actually supposed to be filled
388.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
Yeah, and eggs, bacons, sausages, and briskets have no business being in a sweet dish such as koláč (which looks like this: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol%C3%A1%C4%8D#/media/Soubor:... ).
389.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
I'm not sure I could tell you anything more than Wikipedia can already tell you in my stead. Sausages simply have nothing to do with koláče; koláče are basically sweets. You wouldn't put a sausage in a cake either, I'm sure.
390.
▲
by
jhgb
4y ago
> the backend no longer needs to take into consideration the various clients. For example, the same API can serve a SPA and a Mobile app and some other interactions with other systems(integrations with multiple services becomes so easy).
More ›