Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jhardy54
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
421.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Ownership was passed to a contributor who showed no signs of being a hacker until they were added as a maintainer on the project, unfortunately.
422.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> I wouldn't think there's anything to see there. There isn't, it's just that "raid area 51" went viral and was basically a meme meetup. The point was to get photos of the fictional raid, which were mostly j
423.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
This single issue is not worth overlooking the rest of Trump and the GOP.
424.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Lots of people showed up at the entrance gate, which was widely reported, but nobody went [far] past them.
425.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
React is lovely for interactive applications, but using it for documents is like using a .exe to print some text because you're "most productive" in whatever programming language. You're welcome to distribute your docume
426.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> If funding Mozilla resulted in no return, Google would have realized it by now. They have been doing it for quite a long time. Conspiracy theory: the return on investment is that the active development of Firefox defends Google against
427.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> It’s easier, for me, to write websites that require JS. Why? You can literally just put HTML on a server an start an HTTP server and you're done. How does JavaScript make that easier? > Why should I spend time on that 1 lonely
428.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> They’re almost all applications now. We lost the fight. Please reconsider! I've been using uBlock Origin to disable JavaScript by default, opting into enabling it when I want to (just like camera and microphone permissions). The v
429.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Please follow the HN guidelines. > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. If you can't accept the reality that USPS does more than deliver &qu
430.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
They were expecting to get kicked out of the app store so that they could file a lawsuit and challenge the app store monopoly. How is that unclear?
431.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Alternatively: Close the website and don't waste time on websites that have hostile CSS.
432.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
That's fine, but I'm not running JS unless there's a reason for the app to use JS. This is a document, not an application, and developers who can't do progressive enhancement on simple HTML documents are the ones stuck i
433.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Yep, I'd take daily blackouts over climate catastrophe any day. We don't need perfect, we need to not ruin the planet for future generations.
434.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Smells like ideology to me.
435.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> ATS For anyone else who was unfamiliar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATS_(programming_language)
436.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> is there a specific name for this type of scam, it doesn't follow the typical Ponzi, pyramid scheme blueprint. https://media0.giphy.com/media/3oz8xtBx06mcZWoNJm/giphy.gif
437.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> you people Yikes. > All the while posting this on devices produced by workers free only in name with materials from the poorest countries with the most horrible work conditions in their mines. Sweet, so you're obviously an anti
438.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
I'd be interested to see them bootstrap a CPU from scratch. Ingredients: - Soil - Seeds - Salt water - Rare-earth mines - ???
439.
▲
Recursive Recipes
(recursiverecipes.schollz.com)
2 points
by
jhardy54
6y ago
|
1 comments
440.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
You may be interested in linters.
441.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
You've missed my point. Please see my other comment.
442.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> Could you tell the difference between Tupac and an impersonator? Probably not, but learning to impersonate Tupac isn't "zero effort" (and I'd imagine that it required access to copyrighted material). To be explicit:
443.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
Interesting, thanks for the correction! I could've sworn that Gmail provided some "we don't scan your email" privacy since the beginning but it sounds like I was confused.
444.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
In my mind it's still a paywall, it just costs time + attention + privacy.
445.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> It's kind of broken, but it took zero effort. What does "zero effort" mean? I'd be surprised if you told me that Tupac's voice was recreated without using any copyrighted material.
446.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> Personally, I don't understand how vegetarians justify it as being much different in terms of animal cruelty. You're still paying into a system that's killing animals for your benefit. I've been vegan for years and
447.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
No it isn't. Google didn't originally scan emails. Then they did. Then they didn't. Countering "Google scanned emails" with "well the don't right now" is the only ridiculous behavior in this thread.
448.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
> Hence the confusion. Why would anyone believe that there was confusion? It smells like ideology to me.
449.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
They're literally direct quotes. Nice try though.
450.
▲
by
jhardy54
6y ago
It doesn't need to go in every binary, the conventional attack only outputs the malware when it's compiling a compiler or sudo (or something).
More ›