jfyi

9 ms·

121.
by jfyi 9mo ago
This is a slippery slope argument at best and jingoist rhetoric at worst.
122.
by jfyi 9mo ago
I'll read it for them. This basically states that the figures are based on self reported ICE data and are unreliable at best. The figure is within a rounding error, and regardless does nothing to change the CCP tech and public executio
123.
by jfyi 9mo ago
It's a false dilemma either way. "You are with ICE or you are pro-illegal immigration". ...and that's best case scenario, giving the benefit of the doubt.
124.
by jfyi 9mo ago
>some isolated sect living in small town Appalachia. Calvinists or Evangelicals? I don't think that holds water either way.
125.
by jfyi 9mo ago
It doesn't even need malicious intent. If nobody rational is monitoring it, all it will take is a bad datapoint or hallucination for your door to get kicked in by mistake.
126.
by jfyi 9mo ago
I think you have hit on something. The problem isn't the tech, it’s the eye of the user. The same person who ignores a crooked door frame or a CSS overflow now has a "mostly right" button to bring mediocrity to scale. We unfo
127.
by jfyi 9mo ago
I use AI, I pay a subscription to google. I use it for work. I use it for learning. I use it for entertainment. I am still concerned with how it's going to impact society going forward. The idea of what this is being used for by those
128.
by jfyi 9mo ago
I agree, it's rhetorical. It was meant to be pointed. It's just too ironic in this scenario. It loses meaning instead of accentuating it, and predictably so. It probably wasn't the best device to get this specific point acros
129.
by jfyi 9mo ago
Ask Ukraine about Holodomor.
130.
by jfyi 9mo ago
I agree, and in aggregate it becomes a serious issue for the platform. People who buy autonomously are going to argue personally when it fails in any way. I'm not sure how they would intend to stop it with this policy anyway. It at bes
131.
by jfyi 9mo ago
> Are you getting 2x the money? Probably no and additionally paying $200/mo out of pocket for the pleasure of doing twice the work.
132.
by jfyi 10mo ago
It will open access of llms to developers in the same way smart phones opened access to mobile general computing. I really think most everyone misses the actual potential of llms. They aren't an app but an interface. They are the new U
133.
by jfyi 10mo ago
It's only low cost for general usage chat users. If you are using it for anything beyond that, you are paying or sitting in a long queue (likely both). You may just be a little early to the renaissance. What happens when the models we
134.
by jfyi 11mo ago
Technically you are a wrapper api, but you are acting as a gateway. Though, if you were to claim to be a gateway you'd need pa-dss/ssf validation and that would cost a good chunk of that yc money, so I understand.
135.
by jfyi 11mo ago
You can't standardize the developer experience across different processors. I'm not trying to be negative here, just practical. You are going to run into things like TSYS closing out batches every three days regardless of what hap
136.
by jfyi 1y ago
Are you familiar with the concept of parallel construction? If evidence of the wiretap never needs to be entered into the official record, did it really exist in the first place?
137.
by jfyi 1y ago
I agree with them, your original post lacked clarity. I propose that the reason these types of conversations are less likely in person is because there is typically no log of exactly what was said and people tend to get defensive and narrat
138.
by jfyi 1y ago
"This behavior is a function of the core AI technology we use, we are unable to resolve this issue with a standard software patch or update at this time. For the time being this issue can be mitigated by not asking about seahorse emoji
139.
by jfyi 1y ago
https://www.anthropic.com/research/tracing-thoughts-language... >Claude sometimes thinks in a conceptual space that is shared between languages, suggesting it has a kind of universal “language of thought.” We show t
140.
by jfyi 1y ago
Funny, because one the libraries I was using at the time went hyper commercial (javafxports). Java burned me on two fronts at the very same time and lost me. Ymmv I guess. It's always a good time to try something new anyway... I also m
141.
by jfyi 1y ago
Yeah? Ncurses still a thing? I only ask because that's the only api name I remember from forever ago. I worked on a mud on linux right after high school for awhile. Spent most of the time on the school's bsdi server prior to that
142.
by jfyi 1y ago
https://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/visual%20s... It's because you aren't looking at 20 year old EULA's >3.4 Benchmark Testing. The Software may contain the Microsoft .NET Framework
143.
by jfyi 1y ago
It's phrased weirdly, but the op is describing an idealized status quo as would be seen from a corporate standpoint. It was meant to contradict itself and thus: >We need to pick a lane. I imagine op would likely agree it isn't
144.
by jfyi 1y ago
Given my skillset at age 22? Yeah, I'll take 1995. I was old enough to grow up hearing how great the world was going to be if I learned computer programming just to enter the job force at the start of the dotcom bubble burst. 1995 woul
145.
by jfyi 1y ago
The world of Star Trek was fully post scarcity. Rich/poor were not things that existed. They had to get through this before things got better: https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Bell_Riots
146.
by jfyi 1y ago
A quick look shows not much has been found CVE wise with godot, and not anything on the 4.x version of the engine. There is an interesting case of it being used to build a malware loader. I've actually been playing with it a bit recent
147.
by jfyi 1y ago
The relevance is bypassing the android application sandboxing of the game by other apps and running arbitrary code as the game. I suppose the relevance depends a lot on how much you are invested in your video game.
148.
by jfyi 1y ago
I agree. If OpenAI isn't strategic to the US, that damn sure is Altman's current goal. The moment he can close the sale on "we have to get there before China" ad revenue won't be a concern any more. I'd say it&
149.
by jfyi 1y ago
I think you missed the point entirely. You can't have security without thinking about it. You can have vague sense of security, which is the theater you are talking about. Show me a company anywhere that can provide security without us
150.
by jfyi 1y ago
Those are the breaks though when catering to a large audience with wildly differing threat models. Do you throw away users that are looking for a vague sense of security so they run off somewhere else less secure because you lack some featu

More ›