Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jevgeni
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
91.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Thank you! I realized that the left-side menu is actually a TOC, which for some reason I didn't register at first.
92.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
is it just me, or is it super difficult to find code samples - even in the tutorial?
93.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
I've missed what this guy was saying and jesus christ...
94.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Have to be honest, I didn't know about hate speech laws in Weimarer republic. But in terms of equality, I'd say what we get in practice *today* in Germany and Switzerland (don't know about Austria) is a society that is arguab
95.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Didn't know that, thank you. I was speaking from the perspective of constitutional law as I know it.
96.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Thank you for the insights. I'll only disagree with the last statement. Weimarer constitution was value-neutral as opposed to Grundgesetz today - meaning an NSDAP leadership or NSDAP as a party was legally compatible with the the const
97.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Just FYI, hate speech being free speech is an American thing. Other democracies in the world have frameworks for limiting/prioritizing basic rights, right to free speech included (take, for example, German moderation laws) and have not
98.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
I think anybody has the moral authority to call out anybody's crimes, if that's objectively true. I'm not going to read the rest of this wordsoup.
99.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
No, because your position is indefensible. You argue that only the biggest perpetrator of terrible crimes should be held accountable, and everybody else could be left out. Which is a double standard and you know it, which is why all that yo
100.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
I'm not even going to read this emotional mental gymnastics.
101.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Right, so it's the other guys who are allowed to do that. Got it.
102.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Assange was leaking selectively for years for different reasons. You can hardly find any leaks on China or Russia. This is why the Surkov leaks went through just random forums and later Suddeutsche. Finding a humanized agenda there is a bit
103.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
I mean the title should read "Man confuses personal habits with a product design degree"
104.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
You must see the contradiction in this comment, no?
105.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Also, russia apologists and very dubious sources. Weirdly, an experience that is very unlike Mastodon for me.
106.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
You being downvoted just shows how HN struggles with things like law practice, which are outside this echo chamber.
107.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
The first sentence already misrepresents its source. Jacobin claim: "As of this August, ordinary investors, [...], have lost everything they came to the market with during the pandemic." [source: Business Insider article] Business
108.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Cynically: why would one want a market there then?
109.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
that kind of a dynamic is not unique to crypto.
110.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
If these companies push humanity forward? Honestly, I'm a bit on the fence about that. Tesla was disruptive in a sense that it made car manufacturers massively accelerate their EV plans. But do I see any continued impact? Not really.
111.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
I'm not arguing against subsidies. But, claiming that SpaceX, Tesla, or Musk personally were uniquely competitive, successful, or disruptive while they had a buffer of 5bn USD in the back pocket is misleading.
112.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
While not as profound as you, I think I'm a decent developer. The caveat being that I don't work in software development, but in a role that's on the business side with a mix of management, software engineering, a bit of math
113.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Don't confuse overheated valuations with business success.
114.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Massive gov subsidies. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-201...
115.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Seing how freedom is a human construct, it makes sense only in context of the human condition. So treating it as something separate from outcomes for people isn't helpful.
116.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
pg has a lot of bad takes
117.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Freedoms are limited by fundamental human rights. You have the right to choose your own profession freely. But nobody complains about not being able to choose "murderer" freely.
118.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
No they are not. They are designed to prevent authoritarianism. The Weimar republic with all of its absolute, unqualified freedoms didn't work out that great.
119.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
Do you want to take a test and get a license to work on AI? Because that's how you are going to get there.
120.
▲
by
jevgeni
4y ago
No, I'm asking how many people will donate, if everybody thinks that it's not urgent and somebody else will?
More ›