jetheredge

6 ms·

31.
by jetheredge 9y ago
Author here... yeah, we are loading a lot of crap, aren't we? We will do an audit and make sure we aren't loading a bunch of unnecessary stuff, but the whole site should be served up through a CDN, sorry it is loading slow for you
32.
Scrum Anti-Patterns(simplethread.com)
5 points by jetheredge 9y ago|2 comments
33.
by jetheredge 10y ago
I've felt like any project horribly out of date is a pain to get current, Rails is no exception to that. Sure, many Rails projects have a lot of dependencies, but so do other frameworks. Sure, part of your argument is static vs dynamic
34.
by jetheredge 10y ago
I considered speaking to that, but then I felt like I was delving into religious arguments. My framework is more efficient than your framework! I felt it would have drawn people away from my main point, which is to think deeply about the to
35.
Developers, Go Forth And Cross Pollinate(codethinked.com)
1 points by jetheredge 14y ago|0 comments
36.
A Case For Using CoffeeScript(codethinked.com)
53 points by jetheredge 15y ago|0 comments
37.
by jetheredge 15y ago
This is ridiculous. Google is purposely designing their sites to use more Ajax so they can take down Firefox? This has to be a troll.
38.
by jetheredge 15y ago
Not a PHP programmer, but a fellow Richmonder. Howdy.
39.
by jetheredge 17y ago
Yep, Google webmaster tools have been leveraged.
40.
by jetheredge 17y ago
The argument that they are making is that people are starting to choose dynamic languages because of "clumsy type systems". Since every relationship has to be spelled out in excruciating detail you spend a ton of time changing and tweaking