jessegreathouse

7 ms·

31.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
I can't see this as anything but a good thing for us lowly consumers. Competition in the marketplace is a great thing.
32.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
Every 6 months
33.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
How do the extreme majority of our citizens protect themselves from hackers and identity thieves if they can't have reliable private key encryption? It seems like you are focusing on solving a small segment of "criminal plots&quot
34.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
I think a coding test is the wrong approach. Typically a coding test is too simple to be meaningful, or too difficult to be practical. Instead I would have a Mock PR in a github style discussion forum. Have it be a contrived example of some
35.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
Is there a link without the anti-adblock crap?
36.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
If the government wins any of these court battles, it's only a matter of time until one-way encryption is outlawed. It follows logically that if criminals/terrorists can't use iPhones to securely communicate, then they'l
37.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
^ this. Austin is still a great place for startups, as a talented professional you just have to be careful about which startup you're jumping in to.
38.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
You simply didn't read what I wrote. I didn't say there isn't talent in Austin, I'm saying these startups don't have it, and can't seem to attract and keep talent.
39.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
I think that's a symptom of the problem, but the real problem is that startups are using some stupid, non-relevant scheme to determine "fair" compensation, rather than being aggressive about getting the talent they need.
40.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
I can't say that I'm surprised that Austin based VC's are more risk averse than SF counterparts. Austin based startups are higher risk for several reasons. This is the city with a start ups desperately searching for veteran e
41.
by jessegreathouse 11y ago
Everybody is commenting about loving Aasimov, but did anyone read the article? I read it 3 times and it still makes no sense to me. What is this all about?