jeremyjh

17 ms·

481.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Only if your time is worthless and someone else is paying your living expenses.
482.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Two years ago a lot of people thought GPT-4o was usable for software development. I didn’t really find that to be the case in general but certainly it could do a lot of useful things. And now Qwen3.5-8B is just as capable and runs fine on a
483.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
The hypothesis that makes the most sense is not that they are idiots, but that they have no choice. They cannot meet the new demand. So they’ve quantized the model.
484.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Early investors make money when later investors buy them out at inflated valuations.
485.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
It’s not a “violation” but they said it would be charged as extra usage.
486.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
No. Implicit permissions are not requested by the app, and cannot be removed.
487.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
It simply reads it. That is the whole point of explicit permission.
488.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
I don’t have a problem working with contributors who use AI like you described. But this thread is about working with people who could not do the work on their own. So they cannot do what you described, and they cannot save me any time, the
489.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
What would not work? Give a specific example. The app has access to its own state data regardless. If it needs permanent access to one of my folders where I maintain my data, all it has to do is ask once.
490.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Because they aren’t accountable - after it is merged only I am. And why would I want to go back and forth with an LLM through PR comments when I could just talk to the agent myself in real time? Anytime I want to work through a pile of slop
491.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
It depends on the app whether that would make sense. If it is document centric, then yes. The user should explicitly open every time. If it doesn't make sense for the user to open it every time, it should ask for permanent permission a
492.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Because the app may generate more than one descriptor for it or perform more than one read or write operation in the normal course of usage. If I open a document, and come back to it 6 hours later and click the save button, I would expect i
493.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
It would ask for permission.
494.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Its both. They can never revoke access to a folder they opened/selecte in the app UI, and aren't notified that the app has permanent access. But also, once they've explicitly granted access, and then implicitly granted access
495.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
I don't think any long-term implicit consent is acceptable. I would not expect that after opening one document in a folder without being shown any permission prompt, that permissions have been permanently altered. I would never even
496.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Magnus has said multiple times in the past - through the predecessors he owned or was involved with that he is not involved in the business side much at all; he's mostly an investor and a promotional actor. Of course they didn't d
497.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Yes but they are getting only 341 tok/s. A 2.5 trillion run would take over 200 years.
498.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
So you see better performance with the API plans than the subscriptions?
499.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
GP already said they applied all those settings.
500.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
The difference is that I am not always legally liable for what a rogue developer does with their computer - if I had no knowledge of what they were up to and had clear policies they violated then I'm probably fine. But I'm definit
501.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
I would recommend not giving an agent the full run of any computing environment. Do handle fine grained internet access controls and credential injection like OpenShell does?
502.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
It is impossible to design even in a theoretical sense if functional requirements consider matters such as performance and energy consumption. If you have to write petabytes of code you also have to store and execute it.
503.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
You are still talking about low level infrastructure. This is like studying neurons only from a cellular biology perspective and then trying to understand language acquisition in children. It is very clear from recent literature that the em
504.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
We've been studying brains a lot longer. LLMs are grown, not built. The part that is designed are the low-level architecture - but what it builds from that is incomprehensible and unplanned.
505.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Did GP edit their comment? Or did you read the prompt they used somewhere else?
506.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Agreed. QA specialists are there to think about what the engineer didn't think about. Unless the engineer is incompetent or the organization is broken, the engineer has already written tests for everything they could think of, but they
507.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
MiniMax's Token Plan is even less expensive and agent usage is explicitly allowed.
508.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Which is why they are not a Github replacement for everyone.
509.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
Azure is fine, stability wise. The assumption is it would be mistakes in their migration - edge cases that have to be handled differently either in the infrastructure code, config or application services.
510.
by jeremyjh 7mo ago
> I think they're just somewhat irresponsible devs. Before coding agents it took quite a lot more experience before most people could develop and ship a successful product. The average years of experience of both core team and cont

More ›