jeremychone

28 ms·

91.
by jeremychone 8y ago
too bad, does not seem BigInt made it.
92.
by jeremychone 8y ago
I would recommend TypeScript. I was a "pure JS" for years and avoided the GWT, CoffeeScript, and Dart kind of languages. We even avoided Babel as the added value was not there for us). However, TypeScript is a whole different game
93.
by jeremychone 8y ago
yes, we really like conditional typing as well. We do not use it everywhere, but for when it is needed, it is very powerful. Just one thing that could be better outlined in the TS doc, is that conditional typing is for declaration and not f
94.
Node.js yaml vs. json simple benchmark
1 points by jeremychone 9y ago|0 comments
95.
How we turned from TypeScript skeptics to converts(blog.britesnow.com)
1 points by jeremychone 9y ago|0 comments
96.
Our Extensible 100% GitHub Workflow (0% Jira)(britesnow.com)
2 points by jeremychone 11y ago|0 comments
97.
VDev – High Velocity Development Process, Roles, and Forward Deliverables(britesnow.com)
3 points by jeremychone 11y ago|0 comments
98.
High Velocity Development Methodology (speed vs. Velocity)(britesnow.com)
4 points by jeremychone 11y ago|0 comments
99.
Software Architecture Evolution: from Mainframe to Mobile Apps to HTML5(britesnow.com)
5 points by jeremychone 14y ago|0 comments
100.
Snow: A Guice based modern and minimalistic "Web Injection" framework (300KB)(britesnow.com)
1 points by jeremychone 14y ago|0 comments
101.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Ok, fair and good points, but I differ. 1) Offensiveness: Yes, this is a open letter to Michael Arrington, and it was blunt and harsh, but I think that his style is the same and more, and his post was a good example on how he can be offensi
102.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Thanks for the nice word. To be honest, I heard nothing from Michael Arrington, and I doubt that he would do anything since this article will fade away much faster if he does not. In a way, being below the radar allows me to do things that
103.
by jeremychone 14y ago
The problem, is that removing Michael Arrington from the title make it a totally different title. I did not mean that bored people are boring, it was an answer to Michael Arrington on his "I am bored" post.
104.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Yes, and I am sorry, but nothing I can do. The last thing I wanted to mean was that bored people were boring, as this new title seem to imply. I find this a little insulting, and definitely wrong. My point was about Michael Arrington only,
105.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Well, the title was the article title "Dear Michael Arrington, Perhaps You Are Bored Because You Are Boring" but somehow it got edited :(
106.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Not sure. What I meant is that what bores me with Mr Arrington, is that he is always lecturing from the passenger sit, rather than just do stuff and show us how things can be done. That's bores me.
107.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Note: The original title for this HN post was "Dear Michael Arrington, Perhaps You Are Bored Because You Are Boring" but somehow got edited to "Perhaps You Are Bored Because You Are Boring." If someone can tell me why the original HN title
108.
by jeremychone 14y ago
First, Michael Arrington has never been a messenger of anybody but himself, so, I did not shoot any messenger. Second, the real question is can someone interest some and bore other? if yes, in my case, I found Michael Arrington interesting
109.
by jeremychone 14y ago
@zerooneinfinity Getting confused, I am not sure who is what anymore. Also, no need to curse and insult. Just differ without cursing and insulting, much more constructive and less confusing.
110.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Thank Taybin, this is what I meant, and I just edited it.
111.
Perhaps You Are Bored Because You Are Boring(bitsandbuzz.com)
113 points by jeremychone 14y ago|43 comments
112.
Choosing the right HTML5 technologies for your Web and Mobile Application.(britesnow.com)
2 points by jeremychone 14y ago|0 comments
113.
Top 10 + 1 HTML5 Concepts for HTML5 Application Developers(britesnow.com)
4 points by jeremychone 14y ago|0 comments
114.
JavaScript for Enterprise HTML5 Applications(britesnow.com)
4 points by jeremychone 14y ago|0 comments
115.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Done, fixed. Opera does not seem to support backface-visibility, so, we do not flip it now in Opera, but we do for other browsers.
116.
by jeremychone 14y ago
Yes, good point. We focused on Webkit and Firefox, but we should add opera. Will fix this in the next few days. It should be mostly CSS. Sorry about the inconvenience.
117.
Show HN: brite, a HTML5 MVC Framework (DOM centric approach to MVC)(britesnow.com)
7 points by jeremychone 14y ago|4 comments
118.
Feedback on: Understanding HTML5 for Applications(britesnow.com)
1 points by jeremychone 14y ago|0 comments
119.
by jeremychone 15y ago
If you rename amber, please, do not rename it brite or bright, as I have already a project with solving the same problematic (with a different approach). https://github.com/jeremychone/brite I am going to push brite quite a bit next year.
120.
Louis Gray now lives in Chrome: Is browser-only the future of software?(bitsandbuzz.com)
1 points by jeremychone 15y ago|0 comments

More ›