Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jedsmith
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
151.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Fair enough. You didn't offend me, I just see that sort of conclusion quite a bit; I think it was the way you worded it.
152.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I have to disagree, based upon my reading the question. "You're down. Why? I thought Node could handle it." I don't have any stock invested in Node, personally, but it sounded like a conclusion had already been made by the asker.
153.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I really hate when something being down automatically translates in peoples' minds to a reflection upon the tools. That's like blaming plow manufacturers for a snow day; while possible , there's far more explanations that are likely before
154.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
That's a bit unfair to jedberg, who actually runs the site with his operations team of two (one of them a new hire). This article and the comments are putting far too much weight on the developer, as if Reddit is a site that's constantly it
155.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
That's the situation we have now, isn't it? Some things are easier to filter, since there are lists of porn sites under any TLD and appliance makers utilize them today. So, your improvement is pretty much nil.
156.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
It isn't about the language in this case, it's more about the implementation of a consistent framework. The GUI will obviously change from platform to platform, but the .NET framework (for the most part) works on all of those platforms. Tha
157.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
If the operator gets its way, the .xxx TLD will reportedly have three sunrise periods[1]: The first period would allow owners of porn-related trademarks to claim their .xxx domain names and use them as normal, ... the second would enable n
158.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
For a community that hates FUD about open-source, there is no shortage of FUD about Mono and Miguel de Icaza. It's ironic, really.
159.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Tools to use, in case you aren't aware (like I wasn't, and Googled): * A Mac app - MonoMac 1.0 * An iOS app - MonoTouch * An Android app - MonoDroid * A Windows Phone app - XNA/Silverlight * Desktop apps on Linux - Mon
160.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Definitely. Another term for mostly the same thing, in my book. I talked about this here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2340734 VPS providers give you the tools, cloud providers give you the tools and a few finished products with le
161.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Reddit didn't start with the cloud, though. Very early, they were on dedicated and found it inflexible to their needs, and scaling a site with the eyeballs that Reddit has would have been very difficult with their first architecture. The "e
162.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Oh, it's certainly about cost. When you talk about paying for your own transit, your own power, cage space, and remote hands, cloud providers can be significantly cheaper than owning the hardware. You also lose the administrative overhead o
163.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
The cloud significantly lowers capital expenditure to get into an Internet-enabled business, which cultivates the very startup ecology that Y Combinator exists to leverage and support. Those teenagers who started the Facebook Pokemon game w
164.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I downvoted you because as true as it might be, it's not constructive to call the OP out, and you're adding some of the very noise that you're complaining about.
165.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Do pilots start that program with absolutely no experience, or do they have to have a license (private? ATP?) already? That's a hell of a deal, given the civilian path to flying for an airline in the States and the debt that rides along.
166.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
The perspectives of disgruntled employees have been known to be worse than reality, on occasion. Not definitively saying that's the case here, just saying.
167.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Never fails: a cloud provider has issues with a specific cloud product, so clearly the cloud is an illusion that will crash down on you[1]. Any discussion about any cloud provider's product is obviously a chance to soapbox about the i
168.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
If you're talking about those comments at the bottom, one of the accounts was created just to leave the comment, and all of them were left very rapidly after the actual item was submitted. I don't personally agree with this, but I can see a
169.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Those congratulatory comments were all left in a row, and one of the accounts was created just to leave one. That might have triggered somebody's "noise" radar; I haven't voted on anything in this thread, and I don't see them as noise perso
170.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
His timeline includes a fragment of an apologetic comment from the now-deleted repo: https://github.com/devinross
171.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Not sure why you got downvoted -- it's an important point, and was brought up elsewhere in this discussion.
172.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I missed the "detailed methodology" near the end. Thanks for pointing that out.
173.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
The paper itself[1] says: The study was done primarily on iPhone 4 and Google Nexus S. [1]: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/epicenter/2011/03/Android-...
174.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
The earthquake's distance beneath the Earth's surface, which I believe starts at 0km on the ocean floor for the purposes of these measurements -- meaning, the water has nothing to do with it and the word depth is a coincidence. That confu
175.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
You should put momentum in your timeline drag.
176.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
All great reads: http://duartes.org/gustavo/blog/best-of I've never heard of this guy, but I like him already. Anybody that can produce documentation of this level of quality for a relatively advanced codebase is a good person to have com
177.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
You remind me of that guy in the Farmer's Insurance commercial[1]. "You do realize that this is just an exercise, right?" [1]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNY98KN4p6c
178.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
I upvoted it because I was looking for the underlying meaning of an elegant comment. Surely it means something, I said...
179.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
Fair enough. Will be good to see a correction, then (like that'll happen) -- most of the big names in the media have already run with milli-. Takeaway for me from this: units for radiation exposure suck, and don't communicate well to the la
180.
▲
by
jedsmith
16y ago
It might be where they're measuring. He went on to indicate that at the gate, the measurements had just reached the milli- level; perhaps the exorbitantly high figure is very close to the core?
More ›