jebblue

68 ms·

661.
by jebblue 13y ago
I'm encouraged but I watched the video here: http://www.ubuntu.com/phone We can't lock the phone? The phone decides how to search? Developers empowered by Java on Android would have to go back 1 or 2 decades to C
662.
by jebblue 13y ago
>> it can take up to 5 minutes for a tweet to flow from Lady Gaga’s fingers to her 31 million followers Why not break the load up among a farm of servers? 5 minutes to deliver a single message? It's too bad multicast can't b
663.
by jebblue 13y ago
Yup that, Eclipse, vi, Apache, MySQL and Oracle are my bread and butter. Never used nginx or Redis.
664.
by jebblue 13y ago
Thanks, actually I've waffled again, I'm still trying to make Play work for a test project on the side. It seems version 1 supported deployment to Tomcat but not 2. If I run Play as the server I guess it's not a big deal thou
665.
GWT: Last updated, 2012(developers.google.com)
1 points by jebblue 13y ago|1 comments
666.
by jebblue 13y ago
I was in the military and I couldn't stand getting up early. At one point, I was consuming close to a dozen cups of coffee (including the NoDoze) per day to stay awake and try to be productive, in my 20's. It didn't work well
667.
by jebblue 13y ago
It says "their creator". You didn't spring up from a cabbage patch so something created you. The total context of what that means to you is up to you. The US is a free country, believe what you want. A lot of people died and
668.
by jebblue 13y ago
I thought it was a good presentation, the chart on frameworks around time 40:00 shows what I've been thinking, seeing. If I started a site today and I had full say, I wouldn't use Spring due to its complexity (although VMware peop
669.
by jebblue 13y ago
I'm starting to look more at play on the side, except for the SCala stuff I keep seeing, as long as I can use it from Java and not have to deal with Scala's weird syntax then I think Play could be the new best hope (since it'
670.
by jebblue 13y ago
If you have to say they will support HTML5 but only on xyz browsers or OS'es then it's like a gas station saying they support Regular but only for Ford and General Motors cars. The reason I can say that is any _other_ site that cl
671.
by jebblue 13y ago
This works great on Linux, this is true HTML5 support (or they say it's HTML5 - and it works): http://www.videojs.com/
672.
by jebblue 13y ago
Can you say you are supporting HTML5 if you just get in bed with Microsoft?
673.
by jebblue 13y ago
>> In another experiment, critics tasted one red wine and one white wine. They described the red in language typical of reds and the white in language typical of whites. The problem? Both were identical white wines; the “red” had been
674.
by jebblue 13y ago
I'm trying to understand the viability of the use case for Vagrant. It seems to me that if the developer does not do "vagrant destroy" at the end of the day and chooses to customize their VM; then it will dialy diverge from t
675.
by jebblue 13y ago
I'm trying git to get my feet wet with it but man this looks way complicated to me. I didn't even know about "git config" or even that there was a checkout command for git. I usually cd into the directory I want to turn
676.
by jebblue 13y ago
Snopes agrees with you, the 34 people listed by them on the following page who were associated with either Bill or Hilary Clinton all died of explainable natural causes, suicides or natural deaths during the 90s, mostly 1992 to 1994: http:
677.
by jebblue 13y ago
Wow, thanks! It was like the liberal skies over HN cleared when I read you comment. I remember what it was like during the Carter years. The economy was in the toilet. Reagan took the reins, Iran immediately released the hostages which had
678.
by jebblue 13y ago
Pawn Stars, American Pickers, Ice Road Truckers and American Restoration are the top ones for me, precedence order. I like more of their shows though, http://www.history.com/shows
679.
by jebblue 13y ago
You know what would really be cool? If Netflix would use that money to get History Channel content, I'd never leave Netflix.
680.
by jebblue 13y ago
>> All high end Linux laptops have driver issues, including ThinkPads. That wasn't my experience with mine, so apparently at least one ran fine.
681.
by jebblue 13y ago
Agreed. You stated them well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy#United_States
682.
by jebblue 13y ago
No. Pure democracies enable power elitists to run the show to the detriment of the minority; even when the minority view would otherwise have likely been that of the majority. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democra
683.
by jebblue 13y ago
If faith in something greater than oneself gives people hope; I'd think that liberals would not have a problem with that.
684.
by jebblue 13y ago
Putin gets divorced and all of a sudden there are Russian warships moving into the Mediterranean and now Russian citizens might be punished for using Facebook or Gmail.
685.
by jebblue 13y ago
Thing is though, now you've changed the recipe from what you intend to run in PROD. You linearized it to gain a debugging advantage that you lose when you re-lambdaize it.
686.
by jebblue 13y ago
Remember how PS 3 let users load their own Linux then a year or two later they sent out a firmware update that turned it off. Like imagine buying a car then the dealership sends a rep over and takes the nice stereo out and installs a cheape
687.
by jebblue 13y ago
>> The prisoners in the Panopticon could thus never know whether they were being surveilled, meaning that they have to, if they want to avoid running the risk of severe punishment, assume that they were being watched at all times. Yup
688.
by jebblue 13y ago
>> The prisoners in the Panopticon could thus never know whether they were being surveilled, meaning that they have to, if they want to avoid running the risk of severe punishment, assume that they were being watched at all times. Tha
689.
by jebblue 13y ago
I can see my view is already unpopular but you asked a fair question. It's several key pieces of logic jammed together on one line. That's not the part that bugs me though, it's wondering how this is going to play out. I can
690.
by jebblue 13y ago
>> Stream.of(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) .map(x -> x * x).filter(x -> x % 2 == 0) .reduce(0, (sum, x) -> sum + x); If I catch anyone writing Java code that I will have to work on writing Lambda expression crap like the above I wil

More ›