jdw64

27 ms·

421.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I agree with some parts, but not all. I see it as an overfitting problem. Fundamentally, the topic here seems to be that citation indices and similar metrics are actually flawed indicators, and obsessing over them is just Goodhart's la
422.
by jdw64 3mo ago
His website using mathematical knowledge is refreshing. There's a small UI bug, but personally, I wish more educational materials were this rich in audiovisual content.
423.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I agree. In fact, that's precisely one of the hardest parts of programming. Your thinking aligns with mine. I do a lot of equipment programming for factory delivery. I've even delivered an MES system before, to be precise, it was
424.
by jdw64 3mo ago
How amazing it must be to be called the 'father' of something that everyone uses... I'm envious. Could I ever create something like that? As a programmer, the dream is always to build something that others actually use proper
425.
by jdw64 3mo ago
To be honest, as you know, background knowledge is extremely important in programming. As you move into complex domains, the specifications multiply. So as a domain gets more complex, there comes a point where it exceeds my cognitive capaci
426.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Recently, even a tourist lost to OAI's model in competitive coding. To be honest, I haven't been able to beat AI at coding since around 5.2. People often say 'AI can't write good code,' but in reality, the quality o
427.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I saw a similar story in Chinese media recently. It was about an actor who rented out their likeness rights to an AI company. Becoming an actor is incredibly difficult, starting with connections and all that, and they still had to make a li
428.
by jdw64 3mo ago
The parasocial concept and Chuang Tzu's metaphor in this piece are beautiful. We do not love others as they are; we love an image assembled from our own lack and longing, and we impose it on them. "You're much fatter in perso
429.
by jdw64 3mo ago
This debate has no answer anyway. Because the boundary of how much freedom should be allowed differs depending on individual values and the country. So I respect your opinion. In your context, it may be right. This part is a parallel line o
430.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I sometimes wonder what freedom really is. Should the freedom to harm others also be guaranteed as freedom? Individual computational sovereignty versus the prevention of social harm is always contentious, and claiming that something is alwa
431.
by jdw64 3mo ago
But isn't that actually what modernism is about? I heard about Ornament and Crime in a university liberal arts class, and there really is this kind of problem. When you try to imitate natural forms, fractal structures are fundamentally
432.
by jdw64 3mo ago
thanks!
433.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Aren't you just treating people like they're too stupid? You can't catch every hallucination from AI, but there are still things you can spot. I'm a programmer too—I can tell the difference to some extent. Honestly, I th
434.
by jdw64 3mo ago
These are concepts I've come across in books I've read, and your explanation is easy to understand. But I can tell my understanding is lacking in some parts because I haven't actually tried it in practice. As you said, I thin
435.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Thank you for giving me the keywords.
436.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Personally, I thought the list was about the criteria for wealth creation—like a standard for discovering the most valuable knowledge, technologies, or research papers. But it turns out it's just a slightly different rich list. So what
437.
by jdw64 3mo ago
thanks!
438.
by jdw64 3mo ago
About that kind of 'technique', I guess I should make it a habit to dig into the compiler, which is still a black box to me. I should study a few techniques myself. Have a good day
439.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I don't understand. Even if this post is long and has some repetitive parts, isn't it still written by a human? There are way too many comments acting like everything is bad just because one animation widget was made with AI. I ac
440.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I should study that. Thank you
441.
by jdw64 3mo ago
I really envy programmers who are so skilled at this kind of low-level optimization. The same meaning, but different performance based on notation—it's ultimately about entering LLVM's optimization pass, which likely comes down to
442.
by jdw64 3mo ago
The development workflow is changing, and Haskell as a language doesn't fit that new workflow anymore. The traditional strong type system basically forced you to spend a long time thinking before writing code. The upside is that this m
443.
by jdw64 3mo ago
The Lindy effect is ultimately a kind of momentum. If that's the case, it seems like it's not the language itself, but rather the 'contracts,' 'interfaces,' and 'standards' that survive longer than th
444.
by jdw64 3mo ago
If LLMs had come out when I was younger, I would have been able to understand things this easily. There are some incorrect implementations, but they're incredibly helpful for grasping the concepts.
445.
by jdw64 3mo ago
You're right. But consider this: the geocentric model perfectly predicted planetary positions for centuries, and it was certainly useful. But could we say it was the essence of the universe? In the end, it's a useful model within
446.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Is 'computation' really universal and fundamental? Turing machines, lambda calculus, algorithmic notations, they're all human-made formalisms. Are the halting problem and the limits of computability actually constraints that
447.
ORM: Between Objects and Relational Databases(makonea.com)
2 points by jdw64 3mo ago|1 comments
448.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. Code for readability. — John F. Woods (1991)
449.
by jdw64 3mo ago
Thank you, senior programmer, for sharing your valuable perspective. I'm Korean, so I've mostly studied Western culture through the curation of specific figures, which means I only knew broadly that there was a conflict between Po
450.
by jdw64 3mo ago
thanks!

More ›