Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jdong
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
What's the problem? Using "The Man" seems just fine (and pretty common): https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+man%2C+the...
62.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
The activity reported by namecheap hardly lines up with these reports, mass amounts of user/password combinations leaking is hardly anything unique.
63.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Why did you have to bring up the specific "CyberVor" incident that has been called out as bullshit by several people in the security industry?
64.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Lynx over mosh?
65.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Because even a small amount of packet loss makes SSH absolutely unusable (e.g making it completely freeze), whereas I've managed to function using mosh with around 30% packet loss.
66.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
I don't think you've ever actually been on a bad connection. mosh has saved my ass more than once when I've been stuck with a satellite connection in the middle of nowhere. (Try fixing a failing loadbalancer while on a transa
67.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Except waiting 4 days really wont help you against chargebacks.
68.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
"could have easily resulted in a death" applies to lots of things. Getting in your car in the morning can easily result in a death. From a statistical point of view, this situation probably wasn't as dangerous at it seems.
69.
▲
Did ISIS Take Vatican City Offline with a DDoS Attack?
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
jdong
12y ago
|
0 comments
70.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Linode has probably the worst security track record in the industry. Hacked (iirc) 4 times now.
71.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Are you actually trying to imply that having a DVD quality leak come out far before the actual movie even hit theaters isn't going to have any effect on the box office results?
72.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
BREAKING: Government has discovered nmap.
73.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
IDK what world you live in, but in my world I'm not getting actively MITMd by "amateur bad guys". If that was the case, my NAS would be the last thing I'd be worrying about. Also, what security do you expect SSL to provi
74.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Why should I trust these guys?
75.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
This makes the ridiculous assumption that fraudsters don't use proxies, they do.
76.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Not in the real world.
77.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Possessing illegal bits is kind of a basic example of thought crime.
78.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
I don't see how robbing someones bank account is comparable to downloading outlawed pornography.
79.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
I wonder if this is the official stance of new relic.
80.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
That particular text seemed to be talking about hard drives, not SSDs. Most SSDs support secure erase, unless the drive is defective in which case physical destruction is in fact required. Extracting data from a fully rewritten HDD is compl
81.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
>Sometimes I can't enter a text password, it only accepts a fixed-length hexadecimal string (happens on Windows a lot). Again why? Um, maybe because WEP passphrases are fixed length hexadecimal strings?
82.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Outsourcing sensitive data destruction sounds like a EXTREMELY good idea. Also, the fact that the faq page contains blatant lies makes this company seem even less trustworthy. "The only way to make sure that your data will never bee ac
83.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Except due to routing 2Gbps in Japan is way worse than 1Gbps in the US for most content.
84.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
This is hardly an issue with a system that by design allows payment reversals. If you get defrauded, just chargeback.
85.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
USCYBERCOM is only responsible for .mil networks. DHS is in charge of the security of .gov networks.
86.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
And that 40% is still enough for lots of attacks.
87.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Courts have agreed on them being legally binding several times. https://ilt.eff.org/index.php/Contracts:_Click_Wrap_Licenses When they haven't found them legally binding, they've generally either been simply
88.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Certain clauses will be unenforceable, obviously. But this isn't about enforcing, this is about you granting them permission to do something. After that you'll have really hard time in court trying to argue that they shouldn'
89.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Warden in fact has capabilities to scan absolutely anything on your computer, but it only does it when new cheat definitions are shipped. (This only happens during mass banwaves which happen every couple of years)
90.
▲
by
jdong
12y ago
Lots of things that only benefit one party are legal, why should they be illegal?
More ›