jdiff

14 ms·

361.
by jdiff 11mo ago
Ad hominem does not strengthen your argument. It's more affluent than most other states. Most red states take more federal money than they give back. Maybe you should actually look at numbers rather than relying on memes and narratives
362.
by jdiff 11mo ago
It doesn't need to be effective, it needs to be a computerized excuse to go after more people. Whenever computers are used to target people, the output is always given far too much weight. Recently we had guns drawn on a child because
363.
by jdiff 11mo ago
Only among consumers of conservative media, and they're not a majority of the US population.
364.
by jdiff 11mo ago
The people I work with believe the government, the current administration is funding immigrants. Providing them with handlers who are paid to assist them, open up credit cards in their own names on behalf of non-citizens who otherwise could
365.
by jdiff 11mo ago
They said that they enjoy being forced to be offline as an escape from the world, none of that has any implications of Others.
366.
by jdiff 11mo ago
We do that incredibly often just to refer to only one part of an incredibly broad concept of "science." Sometimes they get unique terms like "physics" or "chemistry," but not always. This is not a rule that can
367.
by jdiff 11mo ago
Zen is an incredibly thin layer on top of Firefox, with some rather glaring performance and battery life issues. Battery life in particular was already not one of Firefox's strong suits. It looks nice, there's some interesting and
368.
by jdiff 11mo ago
GGP used the term "minors," GP is running with the typo.
369.
by jdiff 11mo ago
Biased in what way? The traditional "reality has a distinct liberal bias" way or some other way I'm unaware of?
370.
by jdiff 11mo ago
Unfortunately LLMs are pretty inconsistent in how they use em dashes. Often they will put spaces around them despite that not being "correct," something that's led me astray in making accusations of humanity in the past.
371.
by jdiff 1y ago
Any human could do it, given the training. Humans largely choosing not to specialize in this way doesn't make them less human, nor did I imply that. Humans have the capacity for it, LLMs fall short universally.
372.
by jdiff 1y ago
We're not even solving problems that humanity can solve. There's been several times where I've posed to models a geometry problem that was novel but possible for me to solve on my own, but LLMs have fallen flat on executing t
373.
by jdiff 1y ago
There are, simultaneously, groups of users who believe that Grok is also distorted by a far-left bias in its training data, as well as people who feel like Grok is in perfect, unbiased balance. I think it holds even for Grok that most users
374.
by jdiff 1y ago
Like most quirks that spread widely, a bandaid is swiftly applied. This is also why they now know how many r's are in "strawberry." But we don't get any closer to useful general intelligence by cobbling together thousand
375.
by jdiff 1y ago
I don't think it's meant to be a marketing point, just an in-joke. Like you said, the target audience is quite small.
376.
by jdiff 1y ago
I don't see anything in the GP that implies that. It's simply a CPU that was released before an entire AI economic bubble was a twinkle in Jensen Huang's eye. Of course it has piss-poor AI performance vs something with hardwa
377.
by jdiff 1y ago
I'm quite upset I have nobody I know in real life who will appreciate this line.
378.
by jdiff 1y ago
Apple seems to do that reasonably right in my limited experience.
379.
by jdiff 1y ago
I don't think it'd be wise to pollute the context of every single conversation with irrelevant info, especially since patches like that won't scale at all. That really throws LLMs off, and leads to situations like one of Grok
380.
by jdiff 1y ago
This is fantastic, I've been looking for something like this for over a year so I can type while going for a walk on the treadmill.
381.
by jdiff 1y ago
The page itself is a showcase of their human designers' abilities. Still instills a lack of confidence with a lot of similar implications, but of a different flavor profile.
382.
by jdiff 1y ago
Sure, but there's usually plenty of other tradeoffs in any system of notable complexity. This is certainly a system of notable complexity. We may find that there is mental degradation that's not covered by this. We may discover th
383.
by jdiff 1y ago
Countless people in comments say this, but other people fail to see evidence of that in the wild. As has been said in response to this point many times in the past: Where's the open source renaissance that should be happening right now
384.
by jdiff 1y ago
No, it's rhetorical to ask you " Why are you framing it as if it ever was?" If happiness were a competition we should all be lining up for lobotomies and buying/finding as much sand as we can to bury our heads as deep a
385.
by jdiff 1y ago
The question posed to you was "When did it become a contest?"
386.
by jdiff 1y ago
They're criticizing the lack of commentary on the actual methodology. You can't defend a methodology from someone who doesn't not specify any mentioned weaknesses. It's sowing doubt with no basis, and that is worthy of c
387.
by jdiff 1y ago
I've actually seen LLMs put spaces around em dashes more often than not lately. I've made accusations of humanity only to find that the comment I was replying to was wholly generated. And I asked, there was no explicit instruction
388.
by jdiff 1y ago
Fringe theories existing and being allowed to persist has led to wide takedowns of information from government sites including the CDC.
389.
by jdiff 1y ago
That's a dangerous game to play with Bash, I'm not sure if there's another language more loaded with footguns than that.
390.
by jdiff 1y ago
As I said, there aren't any collapses like that to be had. Heaven and Earth will be moved to make the smallest change necessary to keep things flowing as they were. Banks aren't allowed to fail. Companies, despite lengthy strings

More ›