jdeisenberg

17 ms·

151.
by jdeisenberg 12y ago
I must be especially dense today, but when I follow the link, I see only the title "usysd", links for Edit, Recent Changes, Preferences, and Discussion, but no other content. What am I doing wrong?
152.
by jdeisenberg 12y ago
100% agreement here. Erlang doesn't look like an procedural language, so I'm not tempted to think in procedural terms. Also, Erlang's single-binding variables tends to keep me honest.(edit: add next sentence) That being said,
153.
by jdeisenberg 12y ago
Another advantage of Erlang's unconventional syntax, as well as its single-binding variables, is that it doesn't look like a typical imperative language. Because of this, I'm not as tempted to think in imperative terms when p
154.
by jdeisenberg 12y ago
And therein lies a possible problem with using Arabic as a programming language: it is normally written without explicit voweling, which can lead to ambiguity of meaning. That might not be desirable in a programming language.
155.
by jdeisenberg 13y ago
Had Dropbox put former Vice President Dick Cheney (male, white) on the board, I suspect the firestorm of controversy would be far, far greater. As for "make up stuff about her," her comments regarding the Iraq war are on the recor
156.
by jdeisenberg 13y ago
The y-axis tells the story. In 1928-29, the market lost about 45% of its value (375 down to 200). If the pattern holds, the current market will go from about 16400 to 12400, which is 25% of its value. That's still bad, but not as bad a
157.
by jdeisenberg 13y ago
The error message says: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "_main" (etc.) If someone truly knows nothing about C, how does that person go from that error message to "In the case for C, the entry point is defined by th
158.
by jdeisenberg 13y ago
I think this is what you want: https://github.com/mozilla/togetherjs/wiki/Hosting-the-Hub-S...
159.
The FtanML Markup Language(balisage.net)
1 points by jdeisenberg 13y ago|0 comments
160.
by jdeisenberg 13y ago
I'm still a bit astonished by the number of times I've seen searches in the United States for "weather.com". Searches for "National Weather Service" I can understand, but "weather.com"?!