Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jdasdf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
181.
▲
I Made an Entire Call Center Angry over Losing $94k [video]
(youtube.com)
119 points
by
jdasdf
4y ago
|
40 comments
182.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Profit is not a sin. On the contrary it is a 1 to 1 match with the good that it is providing its users. This idea that services shouldn't turn a profit is a massive problem.
183.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
>Just seeing the Russia v Ukraine conflict and seeing how one country can enforce a narrative by law and arrest people as being sympathizers of an “intolerant” regime should be enough to make people aware that regulating verbal “intolera
184.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
There are well known excuses.
185.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
That's because we are. This helps no one.
186.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
How is it a myth? I heard this type of statement often, but the fact is no convincing evidence is ever provided. The fact is there are in fact options available for phones with swappable batteries, it's just that people don't buy
187.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Yes, people in lebanon don't value electricity as much as the miner, and so are allocating their resources in a more effective way. Who loses here?
188.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
For everyone. The one doing the mining is being compensated with wealth. And society in general is being compensated with a more effective allocation of resources.
189.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Market value requires willing participants, so that's whatever value they want.
190.
▲
In Bavaria, displaying the “Z” sign, will face legal repercussions
(ukrinform.net)
7 points
by
jdasdf
5y ago
|
4 comments
191.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Offer to pay them what they want.
192.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
That's right, the current origin system just isn't as granular as I'd like it to be. IE: it tells me I got X views from reddit, but if shared it in 3 subreddits, I don't know which ones were more effective. Being able to
193.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Hi! I love substack, and have been writing a weekly blog on it for over a year now! Do you have any plans to give more granular data on traffic/emails? Stuff like being able to see specific posts views over time, etc... What's cur
194.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
I'm concerned about the reliability of Googles offers, but the Office 365 might be the best option for me, since i'm already using the personal version of it, it shouldn't be a much bigger expense.
195.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
I hadn't actually! I'll check it out! Do you recommend?
196.
▲
Ask HN: What the easiest and cheapest way for me to set up email?
5 points
by
jdasdf
5y ago
|
10 comments
197.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
The companies that own the railways are in the business of making money, not in the business of screwing Amtrak. I'm sure they would be more than happy to prioritize Amtrak trains over their cargo customers if they are suitably compens
198.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
That's not really a good argument though because there are 2 definitions of inflation which are often confused due to the fact that they have the same name, and can lead to the same results. One is "the generalized increase in pri
199.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Can you explain why you believe there is any form of free expression in the UK? I'm genuinely asking because looking on from the outside it is clear to me that nowhere in Europe is there anything even approaching freedom of expression
200.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
No, this is why it's important to have checks and balances against unrestrained judicial power. These checks and balances must include legal as well as practical costs and difficulties in having those orders implemented. The system sho
201.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
I like how people blame privatization for these issues, but then if you read things carefully you'll see that at all points the state exercised measures of control over the supposedly private company that not only prevented the resolut
202.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Even that would generally not require removing the right of what people want to build in their land! You can surely charge people for polluting the air outside their land, or making too much noise in other peoples properties/public lan
203.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
>The developers can offer to pay the people who stand to lose property value, until the proposition is profitable for the Nimbys. That sounds like the exact opposite of what you should be doing! The fact of the matter is the city has tak
204.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
Simply allowing private citizens to bring forth any charges that the police is allowed to bring forth would suffice. If a police officer can issue a ticket for making too much noise, or bring someone to court for polluting too much there is
205.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
That issue is solved by not restricting enforcement to police.
206.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
They certainly should, but once sold, it's sold and you have no further interest in it.
207.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
> this would allow me to buy a house in a quiet neighbourhood, tear it down and build an auto shop, a 24/7 manufacturing facility or a night club. And that's just fine. If they are causing noise above the standard, or causing e
208.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
I fully agree here. If you want to buy a plot of land, and leave it totally untouched, you should be able to, no matter what that land is, where it is, and what it could be used for. I hold the same stance on being able to own an empty fiel
209.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
I'm very familiar with exactly what local councils do in terms of urbanism and licensing, my entire family is involved directly in every stage of the construction business, from the initial architecture design, to the real estate sale.
210.
▲
by
jdasdf
5y ago
*Except for themselves.
More ›