jcoq

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by jcoq 6y ago

   That's a proposition, not an argument. An argument would be evidence for this claim about "low-quality science". Comments upon comments of fear-mongering, and not a single one has managed to reference a scholarly work.
2. 62.▲
   by jcoq 6y ago

   This article's title doesn't really reflect the study. It should be like "5 year all-cause mortality with HIIT vs MICT training in healthy, active adults aged 70+".
3. 63.▲
   by jcoq 6y ago

   There are numerous advantages to having a complete categorical or type-theoretic foundations of mathematics, especially one as constructive as HoTT. The main advantages in my areas of research would be that proofs in "higher-category t
4. 64.▲
   by jcoq 6y ago

   Yes, that's true, but the 12-16 layer masks were ostensibly superior to single layer masks. The authors seem to treat "12-16 layer" masks as somewhat equivalent to surgical masks throughout the article, which might answer my
5. 65.▲
   by jcoq 6y ago

   This study talks about 12-16 layer cotton masks as being the most effective. They say this offhand, as if that's a thing. However, it's very difficult to find anything with more than 3 layers. None of the citations to that claim g
6. 66.▲
   by jcoq 7y ago

   Everything is a tradeoff.