jbu

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by jbu 4y ago

   One of these went up near me. Pretty cool. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfTkW87vmUQ
2. 32.▲
   by jbu 4y ago

   Were you thinking of methane instead of hydrogen? But the paper does seem hypy. H2 will have its place, but wire transfers electrons better than hydrogen.
3. 33.▲
   by jbu 5y ago

   Ahh, you nerd swiped me. I was involved in a hi rez phone before the iphone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N80
4. 34.▲
   by jbu 5y ago

   This is not true in medical research. By induction why should it be true anywhere? The idea that scientists must never have an opinion is to dehumanise them.
5. 35.▲
   by jbu 5y ago

   I get value from using my AirPods while they last. They make my life better. Cryptocurrencies? Great if you got in at the top of the ponzi, but otherwise not.
6. 36.▲
   by jbu 6y ago

   But the whole point is to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. These just put it back in again.
7. 37.▲
   by jbu 7y ago

   All solutions should be considered. But we have solutions (electrification, present renewables) that are less risky than sunshades in many ways. Also, sunshades don't help the ocean acidification. So it'd be diverting resources to
8. 38.▲
   by jbu 8y ago

   > but come on, you have to be more rational when you're playing in the $10B league. Or, being able to choose between $10B and your values shows your character.
9. 39.▲
   by jbu 11y ago

   Here's some documentation of me getting one running. http://www.lshift.net/blog/2015/03/31/lets-run-science-part-... In short, yes they're open, but they tend to be what I call the 'scien
10. 40.▲
    by jbu 12y ago

    Car ring-tones! yay! I want crazy frog on my tesla.
11. 41.▲
    by jbu 13y ago

    http://chai.it.usyd.edu.au/Projects/Personis Project Description Personis supports an accretion/resolution approach to reasoning about people, places and devices. It was designed to support user control of both th