jbs789

5 ms·

31.
by jbs789 1mo ago
Interesting analogy. Sounds like an opportunity for GitHub/others to better filter these.
32.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Yeah I think you call out the right incentives. Lots of people are very interested in renting out the hardware, and it gives us lots of flexibility vs buying. If the pace of hardware change is what the jensens of the world say, then the ren
33.
by jbs789 2mo ago
It’s fair to compare the two options. Our assumptions may differ - and that’s ok... The monthly costs may go down too.
34.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Guys like Gates are extrapolating recent trends (ChatGPT onwards), but what if you defined the start of AI as the 1950s (when it actually started). Perhaps I’m too distant from the inner circles of Silicon Valley but as an outsider… I sugge
35.
by jbs789 2mo ago
While the topic here is narrow, the concept is broader. Do you take the first step or rule it out because you don’t yet see the complete picture. As a teenager I never hesitated to try things out. As a young adult I wanted the whole picture
36.
by jbs789 2mo ago
> It only gets worse the further away you get from the most popular idioms that have already been written. This explains my experience. It gives me good info about what other people do but doesn’t help me solve unique problems.
37.
by jbs789 2mo ago
It’s a different game. If you’ve got tonnes of employees you have to think about how all the other employees view comp fairness. Every large co runs into this problem. New cos have fewer obstacles to paying more… until they get big.
38.
by jbs789 2mo ago
I find it shocking this needs to be said. Of all you’re doing is copying and pasting anyone else’s stuff, then you’re adding little/no value. You should be paid nothing.
39.
by jbs789 2mo ago
A bot driving a browser feels like a workaround for a bot interacting with a server on bot terms, and the web just hasn’t got there yet, but will…
40.
by jbs789 2mo ago
If a public co CEO acts differently than others and then underperforms the market, shareholders then look at rhe idiosyncrasy as a bad thing. So they naturally all start to act like each other. Buffett had a similar idea he termed the insti
41.
by jbs789 2mo ago
The Unicorn page rubbed me the wrong way. Thankfully I was able to revert changes to my prod instance using another approach. But I count on GH for reliability.
42.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Having Claude write and rewrite something now, each time correcting itself when I start a new session… hilarious.
43.
by jbs789 2mo ago
I am skeptical of David. But he is spot on with this comment: “Yet Dario blames public negativity on a long-standing loss of trust in institutions rather than his own messaging.“ Dario’s arrogance and blind spots are really something to beh
44.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Yeah I see the same thing. Also shows up when people produce an “analysis” largely driven by AI and they haven’t really thought it through. They/we are outsourcing their thinking.
45.
by jbs789 2mo ago
That’s fascinating. You could be on to something.
46.
by jbs789 2mo ago
I noticed it using git more too and it was frustrating me bc I view that as stepping too far. It does seem something has changed.
47.
by jbs789 2mo ago
I found myself swearing at it more recently. It was going off today about having “shipped” something and I was like no… nothing has even been committed. And then it produced an incredibly verbose comment about hypothetical future changes. A
48.
by jbs789 2mo ago
As a simple user of SQLite, I think this level of debugging is incredible and appreciate being a beneficiary of the ecosystem and hard work of others. Thank you!
49.
by jbs789 2mo ago
What are grades for? If for potential employers, then first semester doesn’t matter a whole lot. If for students, then sounds like they are getting the feedback they need w this approach. I guess the question is one of comparability across
50.
by jbs789 2mo ago
And more generally, very often the recipient of an email bears more cost than the sender. I heard this once and keep it in mind for every email I send. How do I reduce the cost of replying. Many times it means getting on the phone/ no
51.
by jbs789 2mo ago
That’s interesting. Also sparked the thought that the assumption only holds if the future looks like the present.
52.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Fair - I should have been honest about the watermark.
53.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Evolution is incentives.
54.
by jbs789 2mo ago
I’m finding I’m able to learn more and pick up hobbyist projects easier w the help of Claude. For the production stuff I still learn and watch it more closely.
55.
by jbs789 2mo ago
The fundamental issue here is the way we use the internet is changing… and what we are seeing is some friction as that works its way through. I have a business where I clearly don’t want any bots. A retailer, maybe they do.
56.
by jbs789 2mo ago
America’s reputation in the world is not great, and deteriorating. Pulling back for these well-perceived/helpful initiatives while building up (and deploying) military force is not helping. It’s really not a well considered strategy, a
57.
by jbs789 2mo ago
Quick Google search shows engagement is down. This post references registrations not engagement. I wonder how much this guy believes what he’s saying. The flipping robots underneath this post which have nothing to do with his message demons
58.
by jbs789 2mo ago
It’s interesting. Many ways these things will be optimised. Just at the beginning !
59.
by jbs789 2mo ago
What it hints at is the direction of model agnostic and custom agents. I could see companies using Pi to create a product for orgs, for example. Low cost and closer to the customer needs than a general harness.
60.
by jbs789 2mo ago
No need to be disrespectful.

More ›