Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jbri
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
151.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
For anyone wondering how the "capturing light in motion" works - the researchers use a very short pulse of light, so when playing back the footage in slow motion, you can see the light pulse moving through the scene. They're not directly ob
152.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
There are sort of two different definitions at work here - the semantic definition which is as you describe, and then there's the technical definition which has to do with the implementation. "Subtitles" on a DVD are basically a 4-colour (3
153.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
c is not affected by relativity. It is a constant. The speed that a specific photon travels at is affected by many things - the medium it's travelling through, for one - but that has no effect on c .
154.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
The OPERA experiment wasn't a race between neutrinos and photons going from one place to the other - the neutrinos travelled the measured distance between the two detection points faster than c .
155.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Consider that in every other context listed, {glyph1} {glyph2} (where both glyphs are numerals) indicates "{value of glyph1} * {base} + {value of glyph2}". For anyone with a passing familiarity with our number system, yes it's straightforwa
156.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Does the JVM finish up outstanding requests and ask the load balancer to please-don't-send-me-anything-for-a-bit before it does a full GC?
157.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
The feature defaults to enabled. If you don't own a smart cover, would you really look through the options for something like that and change it? Would your Joe Average consumer? An insecure default shouldn't be excused because you can chan
158.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
You ... have gained the ability to use secure boot? Validating the integrity of the operating system using code stored as part of the operating system doesn't buy you anything - a prospective virus writer would just make sure to patch tha
159.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Real money. Sell bitcoins to people who are buying them in order to purchase drugs. There's nothing inherently linking the two transactions of "X bitcoins transferred from wallet #1 to wallet #2" and "Y USD transferred from Bob to Joe" - wi
160.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Because science research is funded by public interests, not private ones.
161.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
No, everything PLoS ONE publishes is good because they reject everything that isn't good. The "less selective" bit manifests itself as a reduced average "impact"/"importance", rather than as a reduced average quality.
162.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
The linked code uses the lcg package for random numbers - see this other (poorly-named) question[1] for an example of how to use it [1]: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/16768/how-to-convert-...
163.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Really? The answer with the highest upvotes appears to be rotating words to "random" angles, and links to a post[1] which has minimal code for just doing that. [1]: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/9323/are-there-any-la...
164.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
The real problem with having a monopoly is that once you've got it, there's no incentive to keep having the "best product at the lowest price". Look at the wal-mart strategy if you want an example. While there's competition, prices are lo
165.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Assuming this is an NP problem, then a nondeterministic turing machine is capable of solving it in polynomial time (by definition). So it stands to reason that a properly-constructed quantum computer (being an approximation of a nondetermin
166.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
For this specific issue to be relevant, your sanitizer would have to assume that a particular string is not a valid javascript identifier when in fact it is, and that changes the semantic meaning from something that is safe to embed directl
167.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
> Another downside is promoting an adversarial role between law enforcement and its citizenry. This is an intangible, but I think its costs are real. This is caused by law enforcement/state prosecutors taking an adversarial role again
168.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
So after you delete the last element, how do you get the new before-tail pointer? If you recalculate it right there, you've actually done nothing in terms of the algorithmic complexity. If you defer it either until it's needed or until you
169.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Actually, that's not the problem :) The can't-modify-a-collection-while-enumerating-it issue only comes into play if you're actually using an enumerator (either directly, or as part of a foreach loop) - the code in the article uses a plain
170.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Though you have to be careful with that, because the obvious code for removing from a collection in reverse: for(i = list.size; i >= 0; i--) list.removeAt(i); Is itself a schlemiel algorithm on any singly-linked list...
171.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
What if you go for a more SOC-like design and stick the memory in the processor tower itself? The major bottleneck there is really in talking to memory, and you could that eliminate that entirely.
172.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
> Using an 8 month old version of the Android source is not the same as not having access to kernel code that is still being written. With the linux kernel you can access code as soon as it is committed to kernal.org, with Android you
173.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Why can't you fork it without the very latest code? You have access to the code that ships, which is the requirement of viral open-source licenses. You don't have access to the "very latest code" for the Linux kernel either, that resides (i
174.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
But there are easy methods to see if your review was filtered - you just look for it with a different account. This only affects people who have written legitimate reviews, that have been filtered. It does nothing to prevent an automated sy
175.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
This theory is basically that gravity is similar to other forces in that it's not solely attractive, but things of opposite "gravitational charge" (i.e. particles and antiparticles) repel. If that holds, then an ambient gravitational field
176.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Dropping out of college to run a startup is a bit like dropping out of college to play in a band. For a lucky few (and I do mean lucky ), it works out magnificently - but for the majority who try it, you don't get anywhere meaningful. Duri
177.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Having a look at that paper, the actual rate at which it produces bits is very low - for 2.92μW, they're producing only 500 bits per second. For an embedded device that might be suitable, but for a consumer or server machine you need a much
178.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
It seems like your complaint is "shitty programmers will still do it wrong". Does this "solve" the concurrency problem so that the most craptastic of copy-pasters can write high-performance concurrent code? Hell no. But it never pretended t
179.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
If you're using a try-commit-retry pattern (i.e. transactional memory), and the code using that pattern can't actually be rolled back and retried, then the code is wrong. It's just as wrong as if it were to dereference a null pointer or rea
180.
▲
by
jbri
15y ago
Alternatively you could walk in as soon as boarding starts, sit down and start reading, and not have to worry about looking up every few minutes to see whether it's your turn to board yet.
More ›