jbdamask

8 ms·

61.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
In some other apps, I've toyed around with charging for code access. Basically, a flat rate gets you into to the repo. Would that interest you? Personally, I hate subscription pricing and think we need more innovation in pricing models
62.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Hmmmm...I think they are, sometimes. I could add that to the system prompt. Thanks
63.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Thanks
64.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Lol - I had a much fancier prompt to start, with things like "Be sure to invoke your frontend-designer skill" and "Make at least one applet inside the page with user-friendly controls". But then I said screw it, let me t
65.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Cool. I hadn't seen Emergent Mind
66.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Yep, NotebookLM is another flavor. YMMV. Interesting idea about pulling references. My head goes to graph space...ouch
67.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
I hear you. At the same time, I think we're on the cusp of a Cambrian explosion of creativity and there's a lot of opportunity. But we need to think about it differently; which is hard to do since the software industry hasn't
68.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Lots of great responses. Thank you! I increased today's limit to 100 papers so more people can try it out
69.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Never heard of this. Thanks!
70.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
thanks
71.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Thank you for the feedback and great ideas
72.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Yes, populated by users. The gallery uses the field taxonomy from National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES)
73.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
I replied to a comment above with the system prompt. Something I've learned is that the standard, "Summarize this paper" doesn't do a great job because summaries are so subjective. But if you tell a frontier LLM, like Op
74.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
I hear you. An engineering team at a client of mine uploaded a pretty detailed architecture document and got a nice result. They were able to use it in a larger group discussion to get everyone on the same page.
75.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Awesome. Thanks
76.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Not at all. You'll laugh at the simplicity. Most of it is to protect against prompt injection. There's a bunch more stuff I could add but I've been surprised at how good the results have been with this. The user prompt just p
77.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Thanks. I can guess who this is but not 100% sure. Totally agree with what you're saying. This tool ignores supplemental materials right now. There are a few reasons - some demographic, some technical. Anything that smells like data sc
78.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Fair. If you want to see the architecture, here's the DevLog: https://johndamask.substack.com/p/devlog-now-i-get-it
79.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Avg cost $0.65
80.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
appreciate it, thanks
81.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
cool, thanks
82.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Cool idea...do you mean include metatags in every generated page so socialpreviews can be automatically generated?
83.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Really clever ideas! Maybe a combo where I keep a list and automatically process as funds become available.
84.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Good point. I can think of a couple ways to do that
85.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Totally fair, I addressed this in my original post.
86.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
No, it’s not open source. Not sure what I’m doing with it yet. Can you give me more info on why you’d want to install it yourself? Is this an enterprise thing?
87.
by jbdamask 7mo ago
Yea, looks like a lot of people uploaded articles today. I have a 20 article per day cap now because I’m paying for it. I could change to a simple cost+ model but don’t want to bother until I see if people like it. Ideas for splitting the d
88.
Show HN: Now I Get It – Translate scientific papers into interactive webpages(nowigetit.us)
305 points by jbdamask 7mo ago|136 comments