Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jazoom
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
75 ms
·
811.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Ahh. I was wondering when they were going to get around to implementing that. I might have to upgrade to 5.x soon.
812.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I suspect you were thinking of changing the number of shards, which can be an important part of rebalancing an index. Unfortunately, Elasticsearch can't do that.
813.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
More that the websites actually want to be found by someone.
814.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Googlebot doesn't abide by 99% of websites' terms of use.
815.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
No probs. I suspect a lot of organisations use a database mainly for user data.
816.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I use it mainly for storing user data, error data, login info, etc. I can't imagine how realtime could be useful for that.
817.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
If it's "global" then whichever service provider I choose should see the same latency. If my datacentre is in Brisbane and their closest is Sydney the latency I see will be about 40ms. I wasn't even thinking of the end u
818.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
That sounds pretty good
819.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
1. CockroachDB is still in beta. 2. I've been using RethinkDB for years and I've never found a use for the realtime updates. I think the benefit of that is mostly limited to chat apps, realtime collaboration, etc.
820.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
How does the cost work out? I don't see any mention of that on the pricing page. Or is that just built into the data storage pricing?
821.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Why do you think people will leave CockroachDB for RethinkDB? I ask this as a long-time user of RethinkDB.
822.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I find this interesting. Do you plan to have every database record replicated across every one of your datacentres? That would be some crazy high availability.
823.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I'm not sure if you did take the point intended. You would need a datacentre in every city in the world to get that "global latency".
824.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
You're right. I realised that and came to correct it. Thanks for pointing it out.
825.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I've used LogDNA for a while now. It has been a good experience.
826.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
$0.01 per simple operation sounds very expensive to me. This would add up very quickly. Edit: I misread it. Perhaps instead of inventing your own point system that you have to explain and hope silly people (like me) don't mix up you co
827.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Or childcare workers. Or personal carers. Or etc...
828.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
It's true GC has more of these features but I personally avoid stuff like that because that's serious lock-in.
829.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I'm sure it does. But I still can't see the benefit of a subdomain rather than a subdirectory.
830.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Thanks for the explanation
831.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11523531
832.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Unfortunately that doesn't seem to give any indication of how long that might be. I just saw a post from one of their engineers about a year ago that said secondary indices would only take about 2 weeks to implement.
833.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
I know nothing about database architecture but I'm gonna assume that the individual operations take longer until you distribute the load across more nodes.
834.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
It's there a way to try it out without signing up? The first thing I wanted to do was test your claim for speediness. There is a road block in front of doing that.
835.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
What's the actual benefit of a subdomain for each user?
836.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Perhaps you're right.
837.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
Don't you need to be an affiliate bringing them a decent amount of sales before you get access to that. Usually there is a rate limit that makes it impossible to keep up with all their prices. How did you get around that?
838.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
There are sites like that. Startpage.com is an example.
839.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
...in Angular
840.
▲
by
jazoom
10y ago
The only problem I've noticed with simpleStorage is the Safari private mode thing, but I see that as a bug in Safari so I just show a message to users telling them why the site won't work properly for them.
More ›