jayrox

9 ms·

31.
by jayrox 11y ago
It's not so much the software that they need to mimic but more so the hardware. They have to emulate the hardware to be able to run the instructions on a different cpu/gpu/audio architecture than what the game was built for.
32.
by jayrox 11y ago
Because it comes with the emulator, compatibility modules and anything else specifically the game may need to be able to run in the emulator.
33.
by jayrox 11y ago
they are not porting. microsoft has explicitly said they are emulating. "We have to do packaging and validation work on each title to make it available through Xbox One backward compatibility," explains a Microsoft spokesperson. X
34.
by jayrox 11y ago
this is incorrect. according to microsoft they are running emulation. Behind the scenes, Microsoft has built a full Xbox 360 emulator for its Xbox One console. "Xbox One Backward Compatibility is an Xbox 360 emulator that runs on Xbox
35.
by jayrox 11y ago
that's a good question. in my experience drowning often looks like a person standing straight up and down with their legs straight and still and their arms reached out wide to their sides. head tilted back to try and get their mouth ab
36.
by jayrox 11y ago
My story is much like yours. My mother was a stay-at-home Mom. She made extra income by sitting for a few kids after school and during the summer. During the summers we spent everyday at the pool. Took swim lessons from as early as I can re
37.
by jayrox 11y ago
yes and good for them.
38.
by jayrox 11y ago
that's cool but what are you using to create these on the go?
39.
by jayrox 11y ago
right and this makes me sad since my neo doesn't include and cant upgrade to include u2f ;\
40.
by jayrox 11y ago
and why wouldnt they? android is just linux at heart and many usb kernel drivers have been built in for a very long time.
41.
by jayrox 12y ago
i think many people are missing this key point. this isn't a "i need this right this very millisecond" its more of a "i need this later today if its early enough or tomorrow would be fine" button. which a single pre
42.
by jayrox 12y ago
you got the message almost verbatim but you forgot the most important part "... and kick you out."
43.
by jayrox 12y ago
1,000,000
44.
by jayrox 12y ago
tyl, the true definition of hacking
45.
by jayrox 12y ago
the demo looked very holographic
46.
by jayrox 12y ago
yes
47.
by jayrox 12y ago
first off, quit calling them hackers. they aren't hackers. they are script kiddies.
48.
by jayrox 12y ago
and at that point a complete waste of being in the spec to start with.
49.
by jayrox 12y ago
just feels backwards to me. the <html:* > stuff seems like it should all be under the default html namespace and assumed. where as the other stuff may be better suited to be namespaced. just seems like a waste adding "html:"
50.
by jayrox 12y ago
marketing, the tv commercial has skeletor and he-man. that being said, love it.
51.
by jayrox 12y ago
the jesus fish is always the one i get a small smirk when i see. quick google: http://www.albatrus.org/english/religions/pagan/origin_fish_...
52.
by jayrox 12y ago
Sweet, so now you don't even have to mail your PC for FedEx to destroy it.
53.
by jayrox 12y ago
what are we supposed to be looking at?
54.
by jayrox 12y ago
>There's a link being passed around called IsLeaked.com, where you can allegedly check to see if your Gmail was hacked. DO NOT DO THAT! Why present a hyperlink and then tell people not to use it. Wouldnt it be better to not give it
55.
by jayrox 12y ago
| "Cooperate with me, I have a gun" And so do I.
56.
by jayrox 12y ago
me too, it actually gives me a bit of a headache. almost like when you get used to your work laptop being 60Hz and your home monitor being 120Hz. you can't really see it but you can feel it. nope. don't like it one bit.
57.
by jayrox 12y ago
i read "in good faith" as "you may use these as you wish but don't turn around and try to sue us for using something you hold a patent for" i could be totally off the mark though
58.
by jayrox 12y ago
i get this: http://i.imgur.com/MoeEuZ2.png which is caused by this: http://i.imgur.com/RwZluqB.png i fix it by right clicking and choosing inspect element and deleting the node. i believe the issue i have i
59.
by jayrox 12y ago
its not impossible, just appears to be coded by someone who over did it with caching in the beginning before the site needed it.
60.
by jayrox 12y ago
i always figured it was because they built each page and cached it to html, then that cache was set to expire after 5 minutes. then once the cache expired you couldn't go to the next page or what ever because the cached file was delete

More ›