jayd16

4 ms·

61.
by jayd16 2mo ago
If it's been through a move it just might.
62.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Is IKEA just a drop in for "cheap crap" in this analogy? It's not like all furniture is IKEA by a long shot. I guess in terms of "IKEA is fine if you're 23" AI is fine for throwaway work.
63.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Even if that was true, you'd have to still prove it has emerged.
64.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Make the feature a per user list of flagged sources.
65.
by jayd16 2mo ago
People seem to be conflating loss of control and predictable outputs with management. Maybe that's intentional spin or just wishful thinking.
66.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Source is based on the Quake engine. A lot of those AAA games you're thinking probably are.
67.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Always wrong too.
68.
by jayd16 2mo ago
In a similar vein, does anyone know how to classify the kinds of problems that are being found? Is it possible to build heavier traditional linting to catch whatever is being caught in a more deterministic way? It seems to me that would be
69.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Make sure to put that front and center on the website next time.
70.
by jayd16 2mo ago
A lot of sci-fi authors have published in their 20s.
71.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Did you "Agreed" your own blog?
72.
by jayd16 2mo ago
What engine do you recommend?
73.
by jayd16 2mo ago
So are you saying this cottage industry achieves success or the industry formed around an impossible task? A cottage industry is built around making rocks look good too. Is that an indicator that games are good or bad at making rocks?
74.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Lots of ways but an obvious and generic answer is to use pooling.
75.
by jayd16 2mo ago
no, not like that at all.
76.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Is this top tier satire or pure naivety? You're arguing that military contractors or public companies couldn't possibly be corrupt or nefarious?
77.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Earth codebases only.
78.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Less sloppy in that it's clean and consistent looking but much more sloppy in the AI good looking non-sense way.
79.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Waste of time and therefore money is a big one.
80.
by jayd16 2mo ago
The Vision Pro, for example, has enough fidelity that you can do that sort of thing with a hand gesture fairly easily.
81.
by jayd16 2mo ago
> It's not like Meta has been building their empire on open ecosystems. Is this actually true? They have their closed social graph or whatever but come to think of it they're built on a lot of open tech, the web, Android, etc.
82.
by jayd16 2mo ago
For the most part, a phone gets you most of the way there. They're currently the apex predators of the mobile space. I think the one thing that a headset does bring to the table is the hands free nature of it. There are quite a few A
83.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Sure, a lot of these are super niche. But each one of these costs nothing. Gadgets become software. Its the final gadget.
84.
by jayd16 2mo ago
You mean like if they google you?
85.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Nothing I described replaces or impacts talking to a human. If someone is going to distract themselves in XR, they can already do it more efficiently on a handset. The only change would be your posture and eye strain could possibly improv
86.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Because its cool. I mean, the real answer is that we have the technology to be tech wizards. You could conjure spatially anchored widgets and screens and gauges. You could put a cooking show screen above the stove, where a physical screen
87.
by jayd16 2mo ago
Is the crux of this article just that the Chinese oil reserve is 2x the capacity of the US oil reserve? Is there anything more to it than that?
88.
by jayd16 2mo ago
I haven't (and won't) gone that far, but what's been working for me is denying all arbitrary code execution, grep, glob etc, and then allowing the JetBrains MCP. At least that way it's essentially locked down to the IDE
89.
by jayd16 2mo ago
The ambiguity is that a server rack could gain the functionality of a phone, maybe it's about some kind of self hosted Google Voice alternative.
90.
by jayd16 2mo ago
I think it's awkwardly phrased because it's too ambiguous. "My car is a Jeep now" is most likely saying "I switched to using a Jeep as my car" because, short of a large merger, it's not likely that the sam

More ›