jayd16

23 ms·

721.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Yeah ok, the bear isn't evil but it will still maul you on sight.
722.
by jayd16 10mo ago
If you conflate corporations with any grouping of people, then they're the same as cartels, gangs, feudal kingdoms... Clearly we're talking about a specific modern legal entity with a specific organization that, as you say, can ch
723.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Allow to exist and creation are completely different. Wolves predate towns but we choose to not allow them in towns.
724.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Nothing you said is really in contradiction with what I said, you're just looking at the why from an individual standpoint. All of what you said can be true and also others can and do decide to allow or disallow a group to exist.
725.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Is this just inflation viewed from the lens of labor cost or is it substantively different? There also seems to be other things at play. Are textbooks really so much more expensive because of rising wages? Someone explain that one to me.
726.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Taken to the extreme, you're arguing that tools have only lowered the value of labor in aggregate and that seems obviously false. The value of labor is dependent on the demand of that labor and tools increase demand by increasing what
727.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Just to expand on this. The wheelbarrow increases the value of labor. It's not a good analogy.
728.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Or people starve? But ok look at it this way... What is silly about taxing a sector that is undertaxed because the current system assumed income taxes?
729.
by jayd16 10mo ago
To some degree we already do. Corporations pay taxes. We, as a society, allow corporations to pull resources from the commons because the other side of it is that their existence provides a value through jobs and tax revenue and such. If t
730.
by jayd16 10mo ago
You gotta love the idea of a humanoid robot, shuffling around and bumping into everything to navigate while wiping up a bit.
731.
by jayd16 10mo ago
One interesting conjecture that GQL makes, I think, is that idempotent request caching at the http level is dead... Or at least can't be a load bearing assumption because the downstream can change their query to fetch differently. Do w
732.
by jayd16 10mo ago
This seems a bit reductive as it skims over the whole query resolution part entirely.
733.
by jayd16 10mo ago
I always took it to be a minimum and that "micro" meant "we don't need to wait for a service to have enough features to exist. They can be small." Instead, people see it as a maximum and services should be as smal
734.
by jayd16 10mo ago
> it really doesn't matter how they end up being connected. I think you just mean that it should be robust to the many ways things end up being connected but it always does matter. There will always be a cost to being inefficient
735.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Yeah even further, does that mean that SAAS like S3 shouldn't exist because it has multiple users? I guess one possible solve would be to separate shared services into separate private deployments. Every upstream service gets its own
736.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Services handle the permissions of their own features. Authentication is handled at the gateway. Not sure if I agree its really the best way to do things but it can be done.
737.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Ah, you don't mean enforce a novice making a mistake, you mean ensure from a design purity perspective? I don't think its true that you need requests to flow both ways. For example, if a downstream API needs more context from an
738.
by jayd16 10mo ago
Restricting arbitrary east-west traffic should be table stakes... It should be the default and you opt into services being able to reach each other. So in that sense its already done.
739.
by jayd16 10mo ago
It's about the same for most code all the way down to single threaded function flow.
740.
by jayd16 10mo ago
IAM roles. Said less snarky, it should be trivial to define and restrict the dependencies of services (Although there are many ways to do that). If its not trivial, that's a different problem.
741.
by jayd16 10mo ago
"Self fulfilling prophecy" perhaps?
742.
by jayd16 10mo ago
It was a riff on Beauty and the Beast and actually looked very much like the last live action movie. The logo watermark itself should be infringement, no?
743.
by jayd16 10mo ago
If they actually planned to compete on it they could just offer Carplay support as an option, no?
744.
by jayd16 10mo ago
> a corporation constantly providing -- for free -- updates and even support Corporations could decide to only advertise shipped features, not beta tests.
745.
by jayd16 10mo ago
I gave it a pass for those decades being in "recent memory" even if the experience wasn't first hand.
746.
by jayd16 10mo ago
If there was actually no deal in place then Google is cooked. I've seen Gemini spit out generated photos with apparently hallucinated Disney water marks.
747.
by jayd16 10mo ago
It's an optimistic optimization so it doesn't really matter if the large blobs get broken up. The idea is that it's still better than 100k small files.
748.
by jayd16 10mo ago
The technique has the most impact on games running off physical disc. It's a well known technique but happened to not be useful for their use case.
749.
by jayd16 10mo ago
The (de)-optimization exists, essentially, because of physical media.
750.
by jayd16 10mo ago
The game does ship on disc for console, no?

More ›