jawr

11 ms·

61.
by jawr 13y ago
Did anyone notice this: "Cookies immediately send everything they capture to the nearest Mother." For me, that's a bit of a scary statement considering how intimate the product is meant to be in someone's life.
62.
The future is safe nuclear power, in India(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by jawr 13y ago|0 comments
63.
The real reason for the Bitcoin crash?(theguardian.com)
1 points by jawr 13y ago|0 comments
64.
by jawr 13y ago
I'm more annoyed that this company even exists. At first I thought it was a nice way to describe how they avoid taxes, turns out that this company provides these "solutions" to businesses.
65.
How to legally avoid paying taxes, just like Google.(fidusuisse-offshore.com)
3 points by jawr 13y ago|2 comments
66.
by jawr 13y ago
Related: http://coinmarketcap.com/
67.
Quickest way to search through a JS string array(stackoverflow.com)
2 points by jawr 13y ago|1 comments
68.
by jawr 13y ago
Excuse my ignorance, but can you elaborate?
69.
by jawr 13y ago
Because: http://www.renesys.com/2013/11/mitm-internet-hijacking/
70.
by jawr 13y ago
I'm not sure it does encourage the use of SHA256 crackers.. It's about looking for/generating a particular hash, not cracking or breaking a hash; all that these miners do is generate more hashes quicker.
71.
by jawr 13y ago
Beg your pardon, jumped the gun myself there. Misread a comment on the IRC channel: "unless there's some massive bug, I doubt we'll see the tip of the tree change"
72.
by jawr 13y ago
Sure, you can just print more cash. With gold bars the gold would become (I assume) more valuable. But at what point does it seesaw and there isn't enough of it to be of any value? I guess with BTC there are satoshi's.
73.
by jawr 13y ago
Not an actual release, the VERSION file changed on a non-main branch.. Stop jumping the gun.
74.
by jawr 13y ago
This release is out on 1/12/13 it's still meant to have a major bug. This isn't actually a release...
75.
by jawr 13y ago
Yeah, the fact that bitcoins can be permanently destroyed is a little bit worrying, one of BTC's benefits is it's cap. What's the economical consequences of these coins being destroyed?
76.
by jawr 13y ago
Well put. Perhaps if the energy sector wasn't so corrupt that £71/week might actually go a little further. I'm living in a house with an old immersion boiler and it costs around £20 every 4-5 days (that's only on for 2-3
77.
by jawr 13y ago
That's entirely understandable, but what about businesses where they have huge surpluses of cash and risk of bankruptcy is nominal?
78.
by jawr 13y ago
Awesome. I would have been tempted to call it HTML5 game written in 30 lines of JS and then had some defunct JS code..
79.
by jawr 13y ago
Ah it's the fragments that are causing this. Thanks for the info. Would be nice if the back button wasn't default based to fragments but actual URLs (fragments don't get sent to the server, right?).
80.
by jawr 13y ago
Might be an extreme comparison (beg your pardon if I'm being naive), but it's a similar hinderance to using SSH keys. Carry it around on a USB key, or deal with the security outweighing convenience.
81.
by jawr 13y ago
Awesome idea, should randomly salt them for users who insist on using the same password for different sites.
82.
Ask HN: Why do websites insist on breaking the back button
8 points by jawr 13y ago|8 comments
83.
.SHABAKA(blog.eurodns.com)
1 points by jawr 13y ago|0 comments
84.
by jawr 13y ago
Might be to avoid that very, very bright background.
85.
by jawr 13y ago
Your argument about not trusting anything can be applied to... anything. It's not hard to make one yourself, so if you're that worried about security, don't use a third party plug.
86.
by jawr 13y ago
Thanks, go-restful looks awesome. Definitely going to play around with it!
87.
by jawr 13y ago
Has anyone any tips on any frameworks for building JSON RESTful services? I have been using https://github.com/ant0ine/go-json-rest and it works as a great building block. Is there another great lib I have missed?
88.
by jawr 13y ago
Very nice interface. Kudos.
89.
by jawr 13y ago
That's too many characters, plus "Favourite of 12 Apostles" doesn't mean Jesus', it could be the users. I'm not convinced that it's St. though as when they say name1 that would suggest St. was part of it :
90.
by jawr 13y ago
I was thinking that St.peter would have to be peter (NAME1) but then that wouldn't be enough to be it's own block. I'm guessing the split boxes [ ][ ][ ] are characters and the long [\t] are for numbers.

More ›