jatora

6 ms·

61.
by jatora 2mo ago
I, too, was hideously annoyed by this.
62.
by jatora 2mo ago
First thing a blog does is ask me to subscribe. Second thing it asks for is to subscribe to their premium blog. There are 7 separate requests on one page for my information to subscribe to their blog and newsletter. The first 2 page length
63.
by jatora 2mo ago
"increasingly unneeded"? In what way/shape/form is the infrastructure showing signs that are contrary to growth in need/demand? I'd really like to know if there's something I'm missing that I should k
64.
by jatora 2mo ago
"I never played D&D" Im glad you feel enough shame for this bold-faced lie
65.
by jatora 2mo ago
Even in chinese trained models too. the amount of tokens it requires to communicate the same ideas is higher. it is just less efficient to tokenize the Chinese language because logographic languages are archaic, ridiculous, and inefficient
66.
by jatora 2mo ago
This is wrong. Someone else wanting it is irrelevant. If it solves a need you have, that is a win. Not every piece of software needs to be a market fit. Not everyone wants to grind out an existence marketing software. And rapidly that type
67.
by jatora 2mo ago
People need to abandon the notion of every tool you build needing to fit the market. This is not the direction of software anymore when developers can all build tools that are bespoke to their own workflows and needs.
68.
by jatora 2mo ago
chinese is less token efficient than english
69.
by jatora 3mo ago
The self-servedness vs intensity of the management of said goal is what is different. Wanting your child to be healthy is good. Steering your child to be a D&D player is questionable.
70.
by jatora 3mo ago
"Ranks second" is their statement. What is it's rank, in your opinion?
71.
by jatora 3mo ago
agreed. horrible.
72.
by jatora 3mo ago
Gee I wonder if this is marketing for that 1 MCP server? Yep! I won't advertise it for them, but you can safely skip this drivel.
73.
by jatora 3mo ago
as i said. keep thinking along those lines. more compute for those that arent fear mongered or mongering.
74.
by jatora 3mo ago
This sounds psychotic. An over-controlling fedora's approximation of what good academic parenting looks like. You just want to create your D&D partner. You'll probably succeed lol.
75.
by jatora 3mo ago
Anyone looking to use frontier SOTA on the $20 plans is going to have a bad time
76.
by jatora 3mo ago
damn so brave
77.
by jatora 3mo ago
have fun with your sub-tier models then. More compute for me
78.
by jatora 3mo ago
isnt native english speaker "i really wish this thing in my non native language was easier to decipher" huh? if you dont know the words then read them in your native language. Sol/Terra/Luna are immediately unambiguous
79.
by jatora 3mo ago
I'll correct myself. 1 Skill for helping refine your plan/spec with propositional yes/no questions. After that no more skills needed to emulate superpowers honestly. Workflows do the rest and claude will do that for you. ult
80.
by jatora 3mo ago
Codex has been comparable for a while. 5.1-5.5 have competed closely with 4.5-4.8. Fable blew them all out, now Sol comparable to Fable again. Some slight tooling differences with skills and hooks but for the most part I think if people are
81.
by jatora 3mo ago
No thats probably because you misread what you were replying to and your comment was out of left field. They didnt imply models get better intra-releasally at all.
82.
by jatora 3mo ago
Short term higher profit for IPO
83.
by jatora 3mo ago
It does not make LLM work predictable. Try it on the same type of project twice and see. You think you're saving time but youd accomplish similar results with 2 or 3 skills.
84.
by jatora 3mo ago
Exactly. It really is such a ridiculous waste of time
85.
by jatora 3mo ago
Good call. Break up with her first before she breaks up with you.
86.
by jatora 3mo ago
The quoted phrase is one of the hallmarks of LLM-isms. He is 100% correct
87.
by jatora 3mo ago
Seconded. What a moron. Also, neoengineer... it's just an engineer. And probably a pretentious one.
88.
by jatora 3mo ago
No going back now.
89.
by jatora 3mo ago
no thx
90.
by jatora 3mo ago
Did you read my other comment? Seems kinda oblivious

More ›