Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jatora
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
331.
▲
by
jatora
10mo ago
your google-fu isnt failing. there's simply only a couple large studies on this, and of those, zero that have a useful methodology.
332.
▲
by
jatora
11mo ago
I have seen this study cited enough to have a copy paste for it. And no, there are not a bunch of other studies that have any sort of conclusive evidence to support this claim either. I have looked and would welcome any with good analysis.
333.
▲
by
jatora
11mo ago
claim that i claimed you claimed: "for any coder to claim AI tools slow them down" --- claim you made: "One thing I’ve noticed though that actually coding (without the use of AI; maybe a bit of tab auto-complete) is that I’m
334.
▲
by
jatora
11mo ago
I hope I am never this slow to adapt to new technologies.
335.
▲
by
jatora
11mo ago
it is absolutely poor skill, or disengenuous at best, for any coder to claim AI tools slow them down lol.
336.
▲
by
jatora
11mo ago
not exactly nothing to do with it, they still use generative AI to assist search and saying 'it is no more'... sigh. such a weird take. the world's coming for you
337.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
This is just wrong though. They absolutely learn in-context in a single conversation within context limits. And they absolutely can explain their thinking; companies just block them from doing it.
338.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
to fix having to approve commands over and over - use windows WSL. codex does not play nice with permissions/approvals on windows. WSL solves that completely
339.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Absolutely agreed. Thinking anything else is nothing but cope, and these comments are FULL of it. it would be laughable if they weren't so gate keepy and disengenuous about it.
340.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
The amount that can be prototyped is astronomically higher with LLM's, which lowers the barrier to do these things and troubleshoot libraries/architectures. Naturally the amount of hobby projects has exploded multiple OOM's b
341.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Chatgpt has this baked in, as you can revert branches after editing, they just dont make it easy to traverse. This chrome extension used to work to allow you to traverse the tree: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail&#x
342.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
This sounds like a romanticization of creativity. Fundamentally discovery could be described as looking for gaps in our observation and then attempting to fill in those gaps with more observation and analysis. The age of low hanging fruit s
343.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Coding and algorithmic advance does not require real world experimentation.
344.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
It's a logical presumption. Researchers discover things. AGI is a researcher that can be scaled, research faster, and requires no downtime. Full stop if you dont find that obvious you should probably figure out where your bias is comin
345.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Accelerating. Below is a list of the SOTA's over time (with some slight wiggle room between similar era models) gpt4 | 3/2023 gpt4-turbo - 11/2023 opus3 | 3/2024 gpt4o | 5/2024 sonnet3.5 | 6/2024 o1-preview | 9
346.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
The current trend of continual improvement of LLM coding ability to solve previously unseen problems, handle larger codebases, operate for longer periods of time, and improved agentic scaffolding. The reward-verifier compatability of progra
347.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
If you want to be more specific I'd be happy to supply evidence for any assertions I made
348.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
You can absolutely be sure of market forces not destroying established behemoths. It simply doesn't happen frequently. Inertia is a real thing. Look at Uber, Tesla, etc. I dont think there necessarily won't be a bust for many fle
349.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Funny there's trillions of dollars in the span of two years literally pointing to the writing on the wall and you're so arrogant and blinded by cope that you can't see it. You legacy engineers really are something else.
350.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Interesting, I think it must've unluckily been during a daily restart as that coincides with the timing of your reply lol... I hope. edit: scratch that. wrong url. forgot i dont have www mapped: https://ytdb.io
351.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
I'm working on a rating/reviewing website for YouTube videos, with strong search and filter functions that YouTube sorely lacks, along with good curated list building functionality. https://www.ytdb.io/ With a str
352.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
The only way they have 60-70 agent streams is if their definition of an agent is ridiculous.
353.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Getting pretty tired of this narrative. It's a very GPT-4 2023 era take that LLM's are just introducing untold amounts of bugs. People need to seriously learn their AI tooling and stop repeating this nonsense. At the most generous
354.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Can you list some of your agent streams you have going? Very curious
355.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
Using it for simple math is actually pretty hilarious. Hey maybe they make sure to have it use python!...but I dream
356.
▲
by
jatora
1y ago
While I agree that the current 'bloodbath' narrative is all hype, I'm honestly confused by a lot of the sentiment i see on here towards AI. Namely the dismissal of continual improvement and the rampant whistling past the grav
357.
▲
by
jatora
2y ago
You should actually make an argument for your case if you care to, rather than streaming baseless assumptions and dangling random comments.
358.
▲
by
jatora
2y ago
Hmm. Good argument. Look into how the revolving door works, or citizens united and it's after-effects... if you're interested in even just the bottom of the barrel to get your feet wet on the topic.
359.
▲
by
jatora
2y ago
I dont think everything is a conspiracy, but it is obvious corruption is rampant in US politics, and who in their right mind would think that that stops at leveraging special committee insider knowledge for personal gains?
360.
▲
by
jatora
2y ago
Hmm this seems like a strange take. A bull market when we have s&p drops steeper then covid? And you are aware politicians have insider knowledge, correct? That is how you beat the s&p.
More ›