jasontraff

9 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by jasontraff 15y ago

   Not surprised. I've been following it on Kotaku - Jim Redner just posted a huge apology: http://kotaku.com/5812131/negative-duke-reviews-could-lead-t...
2. 62.▲
   by jasontraff 15y ago

   Just to add, the Honda Accord scored really well in the test with 19 driver deaths, which is considerably lower than the average of 48 and the 350z high of 143.
3. 63.▲
   by jasontraff 15y ago

   I wondered about this too. The other part is -- how much is a car driven. Even if you look at behavior, is a 350z that much safer than a Porsche 911? Or is it just that 350z are driven [X] number of times more often, in the same manner, and
4. 64.▲
   by jasontraff 15y ago

   The key difference between the 'safe' vs 'unsafe' cars was electronic stability control. We talk a little about it in another post. The other difference was size (namely weight and height of a car). Those were the key themes that emerged.
5. 65.▲
   by jasontraff 15y ago

   That's a great idea, and I'm curious as well. I may have to get back to you on that. You can find the report at: http://www.iihs.org/externaldata/srdata/docs/sr4605.pdf
6. 66.▲
   The most dangerous car in America is...(blog.leaky.com)

   30 points by jasontraff 15y ago|29 comments