jasonlotito

6 ms·

61.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
> but I don't know a single person who engages with them in that solitary way, We exist. You won't know because it's solitary. You have to ask, and I doubt you've asked people specifically if they "engage with th
62.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
Again, the article says otherwise. So do the police.
63.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
To answer your question succinctly: The government is doing them, and that could be breaking the law. If you are still unconvinced, ask yourself why you think the government breaking the law is not an issue?
64.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
FTA: They are not used to chase active criminals.
65.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
This is just an AI comment masquerading as not trying to prove a point.
66.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
linting tools, static analysis, CPD, etc. These are all old things you can continue to use and are much more robust than anything you can prompt. These should be standard when using LLMs. In fact, you can tighten the rules even more enforci
67.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
There is nothing subtle about them being okay with producing child porn. That's a hard no from me. You can't argue your way around that.
68.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
2009 is a generation ago. Asking why a new generation why they might not have petitioned 17 years ago seems like asking where a 21 year old was on 9/11. As for a better reception, the assumption was RFK Jr. would take it more serious
69.
by jasonlotito 3mo ago
> If you've believed all the government data for the last 10 or 15 years I got a bridge for sale. It's not about belief. It's about trust. And as they say: trust, but verify. We could trust the data, but we should, of cour
70.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
Yesterday. "In France, Arkane's management is beginning required consultation with its Works Council to review potential strategic options."
71.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
Not in a serious way, no (hence my 'mocking' commentary). It's always playing off the joke or idea of "bribe". But if someone said "I bribed a police officer" wouldn't take it as a joke. Edit: And to
72.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> In the US we sometimes use the term “bribe” in morally neutral or even positive situations. I live here in the US. I've NEVER heard the term bribe in a neutral or even positive way. It might be used in a mocking way, as if to mock
73.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
It's not that it's bad writing. It's that people are used to bad writing. People are used to garbage. For example, your comment is awful from a literature or writing perspective. It needs to be edited. This comment that I&#x2
74.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> Seems like Wikipedia sucks at enforcing its policy from what I am reading? More like policies evolve and older articles are grandfathered in by the fact that they aren't edited and people aren't going back and reviewing old a
75.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> Huh? As a parent with kids who take the bus, people ignoring the flashing lights on buses absolutely does matter. This doesn't stop that. And the penalty is too low to stop this. Nor does this target the people running these light
76.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
This was a post shared with colleagues. Apparently, reaching out to colleagues and friends is verboten now? You are getting emotional. Maybe try calming down?
77.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
This was a post to colleagues. Someone else shared it out. Now, calm down. Your acting emotional. Maybe try smiling.
78.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
Because it was intended for colleagues and not the wider public. https://www.mayrhofer.eu.org/post/leaving-google/
79.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
He has not been responsible for Android Security since 2019. https://www.mayrhofer.eu.org/post/leaving-google/
80.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> how hard is it to simply not be an asshole and not pass school buses when they have their flashing lights out? As a parent with children who take the bus... this actually doesn't matter. You can't assume that the car's o
81.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
You aren't answering the question. You are reframing the question so you can give the answer you want, thereby avoiding giving the real answer to the question presented.
82.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
It is exactly that. You aren't crazy to question this.
83.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> I would be surprised if Trump didn't complete his term by pardoning his family and all those that he works with. As we have learned, we can ignore all of that, or they can find ways around this. The Supreme Court has made it clear
84.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> Larry Sanger (one of the Wikipedia cofounders) was just blocked by Wikipedia indefinitely for trying to balance the ideology back out. That's a lie. He, someone who hasn't been involved with Wikipedia for 25+ years, was block
85.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> Which one is less biased? Wikipedia > Slopipedia. xAI's Grokipedia is 100% more biased, given who controls it and its known tendency to manipulate results. Finally, there are lots of cases where it completely fails. And I didn&
86.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
It depends. Is the text auto-generated from a framework? Is it creative? Is it worthy of copyright? It seems more instructional. I say let them sue for copyright infringement for the text. Let them sue for breaking a license. Let's see
87.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> It seems like this was entirely caused by Dario No it doesn't. > When you run around marketing something as a "super weapon" That's one interpretation of what was said that ignores a lot of what was said. So yes,
88.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> So, a guy with probably one of the largest incentives in the world to trash xAI is trashing xAI? Why not? The guy with probably one of the largest incentives in the world to NOT trash xAI was trashing xAI.
89.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> The link you provided does not describe what would be usually be thought of as a "rule". Yes, it does. > Consider updating your comment to make more sense wrt. that. It makes perfect sense to reasonable people.
90.
by jasonlotito 4mo ago
> But it is also kind of silly to create a project, attach Google logo etc... to it while working at Google. Nah. Fuck Google. Reasonable humans would talk to him, fix it, and move on. They don't need you carrying an ounce of water.

More ›