jarrenae

8 ms·

31.
Show HN: The Paul Graham-Inator(stylereplicator.com)
5 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
32.
by jarrenae 4y ago
I feel I can speak to this pretty well, over the past year I've launched 130+ projects as part of https://ae.studio/same-day-skunkworks and I've come up with ~250+ ideas. Similar to "look for anomalies"
33.
by jarrenae 4y ago
This seems like a smart move from Apple to continue expanding into international markets and increasing revenue potential from their subscription models. Offering a wider range of price points will allow developers to better tailor their pr
34.
Theoretical Nuclear Impacts – World Map(nucleardisastermap.com)
4 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
35.
Risk of Nuclear Disaster Map(nucleardisastermap.com)
2 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
36.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Not yet, though ideally we'd be able to add text resizing as well as color changes. I'd really like to try 2 lines of text, especially because on the new MacBook Pros the notch increases the menu bar height.
37.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Great! Let me know what you think, and if you have any suggestions.
38.
Show HN: Barbell – A subtle news ticker in the menu bar(barbellformac.com)
2 points by jarrenae 4y ago|6 comments
39.
Show HN: I made a tool to browse HN on an iPod Classic in the browser(ipodsocial.com)
2 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
40.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Thanks a lot! And credit where credit is due to the original iPod.js that we built off of. As for the idea, it's sort of the nostalgia trip paired with the idea of browsing modern sites with an outdated device. Similar to people who co
41.
Show HN: Browse HN on an iPod Classic(ipodsocial.com)
4 points by jarrenae 4y ago|2 comments
42.
Computronium(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
43.
Show HN: I built a custom web query tool that is surprisingly useful(heftysearch.com)
2 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
44.
A Model for the Probability of Nuclear War(gcrinstitute.org)
1 points by jarrenae 4y ago|0 comments
45.
by jarrenae 4y ago
In complete transparency, the "jury is out" on this sort of conversation, meaning we don't completely know. Getty Images/Unsplash said they're not allowing AI images because of this concern, but I personally believe
46.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Yeah, that's the unfortunate side effect of generated images, there's no comprehension of generation on the AI's side of things. People rarely come out correctly right now, but animals tend to do a bit better. Inanimate objec
47.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Spot on. In my initial sketches for the site I had vertical/horizontal sorting for images, and I think we'll be able to add that pretty quickly.
48.
by jarrenae 4y ago
This is definitely a fair assessment. I think a lot of the "wow" factor is just seeing the generated images in the first place. In truth I think a lot of value will be added as we start improving filtering. Once users are able to
49.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Upsizing is something I'm really hoping to bring in the next version of the site. I'm imagining a variety of different tools to improve the images, so ideally if an image is good enough for somebody, they could "enhance it&qu
50.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Sorry, it's a little clunky at the moment. Just to clarify, you're actually directly searching for images that have been previously been summoned by other users. Our recommendation algorithm right now is "pretty bad" bec
51.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Thanks for the feedback, and I totally agree. I'd really hoped to fill out the landing page a bit more before we launched today, but we weren't able to roll it out in time. Honestly I'm taking a lot of inspiration from Unspl
52.
by jarrenae 4y ago
You're spot on with the curation! I'm really exciting to add voting and weighing to the images. I think that's where this'll really start to shine. "Girl reading in a coffee shop" generates about 1 usable image
53.
by jarrenae 4y ago
That's one of the things I've found deeply interesting about the current generation of tools, there's little (if any) comprehension going on, it's really just trying to "enhance" a blur/bit of noise to mak
54.
by jarrenae 4y ago
I'm excited to see the next versions of Stable Diffusion. I think we'll probably see this improve significantly over the next year.
55.
by jarrenae 4y ago
haha well I hadn't considered this, but you've actually stumbled upon something interesting. Duly noted! We're using a synonym API that's separate from the image summoning. Basically our filtering happens after the synon
56.
by jarrenae 4y ago
100% Agreed on this one. I was really hoping we'd have that feature ready before launching today. Hopefully we'll have an early version up in the next week or so.
57.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Yeah, unfortunately uncanny valley is spot on for most generated faces with this version of Stable Diffusion. I've seen some people tackle the problem by running faces through a secondary AI that makes faces look "better" [1]
58.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Thanks a lot! Of course Stable Diffusion is doing most of the heavy lifting here, but we're working hard to make the UI way more user-friendly and provide real lasting utility. If you have any suggestions, I'm all ears.
59.
by jarrenae 4y ago
I'm interested to hear why you think so? If theres's something specifically wrong with what we've built that we could possibly improve, I'd appreciate the feedback.
60.
by jarrenae 4y ago
Interesting. Over time we'll be working to improve more specific searches to prevent unusual errors. Right now we're just loosely comparing letters in searches. And yeah, our servers are working overtime, but what's fun is th

More ›