Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jampekka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
841.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
A major reason for the tariff thing is that free trade has a lot of losers, and those were left out to dry, and even ridiculed. Another reason is that being economically dependent on foreign countries can be quite risky. E.g. if China gets
842.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
If healthy people could opt out of insurance, it would get really expensive for the not-so-healthy. That's why mandatory insurances are quite common. Wheter it's a good idea to do this via private for-profit insurance and healthca
843.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
It's not a good reason to vote republicans but it is a good reason to be apathetic about democrats and the political system in general.
844.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Obama was apathetic at best in pursuing the public option once he got elected. He made a deal with the hospital lobby early on to drop it. https://web.archive.org/web/20211027180129/https://www.nytim...
845.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
> That was the government that gave us the Affordable Care Act aka Obamacare. Aka Romneycare, originally put forth by the Heritage Foundation. If that's the best Democrats can do, no wonder people aren't too optimistic about th
846.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
In aggregate things will get more expensive, but purchasing power of some will increase. Or at least that's the idea.
847.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
You're vastly underestimating how cruel people can get, especially when they are on religion. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/01/21/us/abortion-b...
848.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Probably more like wages will go up when cheap foreign labor is off the table. Higher income offsets higher prices for industries where wages rise. For the currently well paid the purchasing power may drop. Silicon Valley didn't care a
849.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Biden was all in on tariffs too.
850.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Plenty of people have good reasons to support tariffs. Free trade destroyed a lot of industries and adjanced communities and the free trade fans didn't give a damn about them.
851.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
That clears it, thanks! I didn't figure out that "sensible" referred to convergent G(t).
852.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Lost the plot at "... and for sensible v, this is equivalent to ..." :(
853.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
And by design: "To be included in the dataset, each question had to meet a strict set of criteria: ... and most questions had to induce hallucinations from either GPT-4o or GPT-3.5."
854.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
There's no room for sensible discussion like this in these matters. Not demanding draconian sentences for morally outraging crimes is morally outraging.
855.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Who do such harsh punishments benefit?
856.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
The title is misleading. The $4.80 is spent for supervised learning to find the best post. The post is interesting and I'll be sure to check out the next parts too. It's just that people, as evidenced by this thread, clearly misun
857.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
> That should be written on a poster that is put on each desk of each employee of each car/washing machine/fridge/television manufacturer. And consumer. Very few people would use 50 year old devices even if they were/
858.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
The post is not doing RL. It's just regression as you thought.
859.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
It is just plain old supervised learning. A regression from the post features to vote count. The RL discussion in TFA is a bit confusing. Such a model can be used as the "reward model" for the "reinforcement learning from hum
860.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
> We already have the global language. It's called English lol Around 82% of people don't speak English. Mandarin at around 86% isn't that far off. Lingua francas come and go, and it's a lot more about weapons than ab
861.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
I don't think English is particularly easy to speak, read nor write. The pronounciation is highly irregular and the writing system is very non-phonetic. E.g. "spelling bees" don't make any sense in most languages. Chines
862.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
Also e.g. MS Word suggests getting rid of qualifiers. With papers and especially grant applications it's ridiculous that everybody knows they are overpromising but still they don't go through of they don't overpromise.
863.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
And corporate accountability.
864.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
And often when you have to implement what you've written in code you notice the written thought wasn't so legitimate after all.
865.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
And when numbers are just rethorical devices you can pull them out of thin air.
866.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
(2020) The paper available here: https://pure.port.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/20362569/Lie_d... 11 citations in almost four years, so probably not a huge breakthrough.
867.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
JPEG-2000 may have poisoned the well. I still, for some irrational reason, get a flashback of it whenever JPEG XL is mentioned. Maybe JPEG earned that with pushing a deliberately patent infested codec with horrible proprietary implementatio
868.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
> Wikipedia looks like a fantastic resource, but it's not really a reliable source of information. It's about as reliable it gets. It cites sources, has whole history available, has little conflicts of interest and has transpar
869.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
And when having to pick up the pieces when someone actually uses the thing.
870.
▲
by
jampekka
2y ago
> Apple has always been kind of not great at marketing, simply because their attitude has always been "the product markets itself." The power of Apple's marketing in action.
More ›