Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jamil7
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
571.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
> (e.g. almond "milk" involves more CO2 emissions than milk) No it doesn’t.
572.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Thanks for the article, I’m not American nor do I live there so I’m not so well versed on US labour law and unions. From reading the article however it seems this issue was particular to rail union workers? > Unlike the National Labor Re
573.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
I wonder if more and more of these ethical issues will be what pushes tech workers to unionise rather than working conditions.
574.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Recently worked on an iOS app with the exact same thing, delays inserted on every write which was basically instant as it was writing to SQLite. Client refused to remove it too, you need to pick your battles as a freelancer to get anything
575.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
> I never had a paid customer Getting at least one paid customer shouldn't be all that hard, I feel like you've been spending too much time interacting with and marketing to "indiehackers" who are essentially influenc
576.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
> It's driven by public investment as opposed to private investment for one thing. Right fair enough, I suppose it’s comparable to new public transport connections driving up apartment costs.
577.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
So an area becomes more attractive and those with higher purchasing power drive out the original inhabitants? So… how is this different to normal gentrification? Why is the fact that it’s parks and green spaces relevant?
578.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
2022 thread for comparison: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29746236
579.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Literally everything in this comment is wrong.
580.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
I feel it should be the opposite. If Apple is heading in the direction of more service revenue and is forced to compete on a level playing field with competitors like Spotify, for example, wouldn't this encourage them to improve Apple
581.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
The software you like isn't going anywhere and you don't have to change any of those defaults. The mac allows you to change defaults and install whatever you want and it's still a great platform.
582.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Thanks for your work on this I had no idea it existed, definitely going to try it out.
583.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
The iOS client has some weird offline behaviour, where you will often need to force it using airplane mode to trip whatever flag turns the whole client into offline-mode rather than it just... playing the song that it clearly has the data d
584.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
The ship has sailed on nuclear for Germany no matter where you stand on the topic and there’s not a lot of valuable discussion left to warrant trotting this point out at every opportunity.
585.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Yeah event sourcing and what you described is what these libraries are calling delta CRDTs. The appeal is they’re hiding away the actual event log, metadata and rebasing/merging parts and exposing data types that look something like wh
586.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
> Last Writer Wins is not the most compelling use case for CRDT because if those fruits were denormalized into Postgres rows, you'd already have the behavior described. I'm not sure from the article, but I'm guessing the d
587.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
The point is that they all eventually converge on the same value, and can do that independent of some centralised merging location, rather than the exact way in which they do that, whether that's LLW or anything else.
588.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
> Zero dollars were spent solving problems uniquely created by not having the benefits of null? This one doesn't make any sense in the context of the languages being discussed. What unique problems does it create in Swift/Kotli
589.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
No but since they’re all getting merged in one place you don’t really need a CRDT for that although you could. That was my point.
590.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Their linked summary mentions Peritext and the current limitations. Agree it’s exciting though and you can implement it fairly easily yourself by following the blog post as it’s so well written and explained.
591.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
The article talks about this, in the case where your clients are syncing with a centralised server you don't necessarily need to use CRDTs, and it might be simpler not to.
592.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
No, it took me a bit to understand as well. It looks like a set of host SDKs and a sandboxed runtime (guessing this is why they're using wasm) you can drop into your own software and expose some hooks that would allow your users to wri
593.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
It's not offensive as much as it's kind of odd sounding, and would feel awkward pitching to someone else.
594.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
The parent comment didn't say they are. It's a very well known talk in which the speaker describes a hypothetical future technology that looks a lot like WASM.
595.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
I think most proponents would say it replaces existing forms of welfare, some pitch it as being cheaper since one can remove a lot of overhead by having everyone be eligible.
596.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
I don't agree. I could see UBI keeping a roof over someone with a crippling drinking problems head or giving someone with severe mental health issues enough bandwidth to seek treatment, or at the very least sheltered.
597.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Agree, I tend to go through my work with `git add --patch` and committing that way. I find it also works as a quick refresh on what you actually did and helps you decide how/if to split up your work into multiple commits.
598.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Sit down with a coffee, read the book https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2 and just spend the time learning how to use it. You'll save yourself a bunch of time and headache and won't need to be nuking repos or
599.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
I feel like variability we can engineer around. What I’m more concerned about as someone generally pro wind/solar is how we’re going to discover and build supply chains for all the extra materials we need for this transition. We need a
600.
▲
by
jamil7
4y ago
Oh yeah that period was rough. Xcode and Swift are a lot more stable these days. I guess my experience is also tainted by webpack-heavy JS work from years ago that was a dependency/tooling nightmare. It seems better now with the newer
More ›