Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jamii
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
60 ms
·
481.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Are you still focusing on US devs?
482.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
SEEKING WORK - London or remote. Here are some things I've worked on lately: LSH clustering in low memory (currently ~800GB of input data in 4GM RAM) - https://github.com/jamii/springer-recommendations A Go-playin
483.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
SEEKING WORK - London or remote. Here are some things I've worked on lately: LSH clustering in low memory (currently ~800GB of input data in 4GM RAM) - https://github.com/jamii/springer-recommendations A Go-playin
484.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Most macros fall under one of three categories. Improving performance by removing function calls or doing work at compile time eg https://github.com/ztellman/vertigo emulates c-style structs and uses macros to calculat
485.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Teaching programming sounds very rewarding. How did you get started?
486.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Yes, www.gov.uk is the product of the new Digital Government Service which I linked above. They haven't been around for very long yet and they are currently only responsible for the government web-services but I hope that their success
487.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
So, basically you want this - http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/about/ It's worked so far. It remains to be seen how it will age - maybe in ten years time it will be just as buried in bureaucracy as the rest of
488.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
It's interesting that the UK seems to be getting around this by doing stuff in-house. So now we have the open government license ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licen... ) and government web
489.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Sounds like this is what you want - https://github.com/Element84/vdd-core/wiki/What-is-Visualiza... EDIT: Or even http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6iUm_Cqx2s
490.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
From what I can see, all of the sibling links just eval javascript. I believe LT goes one step further and uses the jit to replace code, so that even closures (eg event handlers attached to the dom) are updated to use the new code.
491.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
You can even write c-like structs over byte-buffers - https://github.com/ztellman/vertigo
492.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
SEEKING WORK - London or remote. Here are some things I've worked on lately: Scalable recommendations engine - https://github.com/jamii/springer-recommendations Concise pattern matching and parsing - https:/
493.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Haskell has rewrite rules which is how eg stream fusion is implemented. http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.1/html/users_guide/rewri...
494.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
What about when the pure code is too slow to run? Or when the pure code is wrong but the jet is right - so that the nook spec is now not sufficient to determine semantics. Let me bury that criticism though by saying that this is the most be
495.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
I'm doing this at the moment. We have a gnarly ball of legacy code that is burning out devs. It actively resists any attempt to disentangle its parts and after years of attempts at refactoring it's gnarliness is barely reduced. I&
496.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
That doesn't take into account how good a language is for prototyping and experimenting. Even if I have to write in $blublang, I'll probably still prototype it in $petlang for the increased productivity and then port it once I hav
497.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
I've had his blog bookmarked for a while but never got around to actually reading it. I'll have to take a look, thanks.
498.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
The paper introducing graphchi has dozens of examples of graphchi on a mac mini running rings around 10-100 machine hadoop clusters - http://graphlab.org/graphchi/ I worked on a project earlier this year that was envis
499.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
This idea - having locally unrestricted components connected by a restricted, declarative system - seems to keep popping up and never quite taking off. Hopefully sooner or later someone will spin it just right. Some related projects: Opis -
500.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
It does make a difference but I messed up the code :S If you try the updated gist you will find that the second distribution appears to converge for a while but always jumps away again. I've run it now for 20540000 rounds and its furth
501.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Sorry, I should have been more specific :S You have assumed a fixed amount in each envelope. The article leaves the amount unspecified but implicitly assumes that there is no maximum amount that could be in the envelope. The problem only be
502.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Terence Tao has some interesting writing on the interplay between rigour and intuition: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/there%E2%80%99s-... Nevertheless, this problem is interesting because people tend to t
503.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Goddamn, what does it take to get a cookie around here? :D
504.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Well, with the distribution I gave it could be $2 (with probability 1/2), or $4 (with probability 1/4), or $8 (with probability 1/8) etc. That distribution doesn't have a maximum. For a simpler example, imagine tossing a
505.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
The expected value in the St Petersburg game is actually well-defined - it converges to positive infinity. That is a subtly different result than not converging at all. Both problems are useful.
506.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
I think the point he is getting at is that expected value (or even expected utility) is not actually a good measure of human preferences. Additionally, in this problem there are certain distributions over the amounts in the envelope for whi
507.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Not so much that it leads to nonsense as that naively applying expectations doesn't always work. This is a contrived example, but it's not uncommon in eg random walk theory to hit upon cases like this where the expectation does no
508.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
I'm not assuming that that is the distribution. I'm saying that the problem as presented is underspecified, but even if you give this specific distribution in the problem you can still cause confusion. Assuming stuff is bad but
509.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
The problem here is that you are adding together two values for a specific case of x and then adding together the result for all values of x (is that clear? probably not). It's analogous to another age old problem: what is the value of
510.
▲
by
jamii
13y ago
Go ahead and run a few million simulations of the problem and graph the running mean over time. You might be surprised :) Be sure to use exact arithmetic (eg http://docs.python.org/2/library/fractions.html )
More ›