Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jama211
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
751.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Many reasons, if this news were summarised by humans I would prefer it, one example reason is with AI summaries I know to look out for hallucinations. To be honest though that’s not the point. I’m more annoyed they weren’t transparent about
752.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I have Tahoe and it’s just as good at being a desktop os as any of the previous os’s. Not sure what you’re referring to.
753.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I am fine with it using AI but it makes me feel pretty icky that they didn’t mention that this was ai/llm generated at any point in this article. That’s a no-no IMO, and has turned me off this pretty strongly.
754.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Ram is cheap, 99.9% of the audience that would use this are running heavy envs on powerful computers. I can totally understand why they write it that way. Better to have faster iteration and alienate 0.1% of serious users than to slow devel
755.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
This is a really clever solution
756.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Marvin the robot filter! What a great way to put it. There’s so many sour old men on this site haha
757.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
It’s not broken, just not to your liking. It’s one extra click. Also way to miss my point.
758.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I would say that that’s a valid _model_ we can use to describe creation, much like how maths is a model we use to describe the universe. However, whether maths IS the universe or creation IS discovery are more of a philosophical question, p
759.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
All this amazing art and stuff on this site and all you could do was find something nitpicky to complain about? Sure says a lot…
760.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I’m sorry who did you mean to say this to? Not sure this is relevant here
761.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I just read it as a turn of phrase that says exactly that, that it means they produce something rather than nothing.
762.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Yeah bad faith commenter then
763.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Or just ship it, always an option
764.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
To be fair, you read a description of their method, rather than them using the method in front of you.
765.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Err you know they match the video to the audio delay on modern smart phone apps right? The only time you actually experience latency is when you attempt to pause/play the media, or you’re trying to do something in real time (like recor
766.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
People already basically do this - big twitch streamers and YouTubers get overwhelmed with being sent random stuff, there’s tons of videos where they open a bunch of them up. It’s not a living room, but it’s not far off the concept.
767.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Ecoflow fucked up, more news at 11.
768.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
You’re not supposed to zero in on the ways in which an analogy doesn’t apply. You’re simply supposed to read the analogy in order to see what it’s attempting to _highlight_ about the scenario. This is a common pet peeve of mine, people not
769.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
One way or another, many of us are in agreement the company screwed up and it’s on them to fix it - whether that’s their marketing, their manual, their lack of over voltage protection, whatever it is it’s their fault. Yet so many people in
770.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Because it’s an extreme claim backed up with no evidence. Hanlon’s razor applies here.
771.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
This isn’t electronic components, this is sold as a consumer level gadget that anyone can use. No one expects a standard consumer to understand data sheets like that. You started off by saying you don’t know about the components they’re sel
772.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Ah, I see where we went wrong here, you never specified that you meant reputation in your mind only. FYI, “reputation” is usually considered to be related to a general public opinion, not your personal one.
773.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Exactly
774.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Well said
775.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Hahaha fair
776.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Doesn’t seem so bad then
777.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I mean they could be more tightly integrated but any agency could match one account with another any time they felt like it
778.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Technically, they could indeed upgrade passports with an online verification feature and make them mandatory and it would work.
779.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I find it hard to make a nuanced take without being downvoted sometimes, but I honestly both agree this is bad/not necessary, AND that half the people in here are worrying a little too much/being a bit too pessimistic about it. Ca
780.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
It was introduced by the Tories, supported by both parties, and you live in a place with FPTP voting. Not voting for labour isn’t going to help anything except give more power to the others who are worse.
More ›