Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jama211
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
541.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Emphasis on ‘some’. Compare that to the article title!
542.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Unfortunately the social network aspect is still hugely valuable though. It will take a big change for anything to happen on that front.
543.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
This sounds profound but really isn’t, how about if we have to ask what it is _in a forum already specialised to those who could be interested_ then it demonstrates a serious communication issue?
544.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
I feel like it’s more like using an electronic dictionary in a spelling bee that already allowed you to use a paper dictionary. All it really does is demonstrate that the format isn’t suited to be a competition in the first place. Which is
545.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
I’ll be honest, I’m confused by the ending. It says this is a series of jabs at LLM hype, and I understand that it’s intended as a series of jabs against those who would say “software engineers will be out of a job”, but I’ll be honest I th
546.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Software engineering isn’t dead and won’t be dead from LLMs, I have no fear of that, but coding by hand may become as usually unnecessary as coding in assembly is now. And I think that’s ok.
547.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
I would’ve loved to see some notable highlights in this article!
548.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
We’re starting to get to a point where the ai can generate better code than your average developer, though. Maybe not a great developer yet, but a lot of products are written by average developers.
549.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
I agree with your point generally, but wouldn’t call adobe software buggy or poorly maintained. That’s a bit of a stretch.
550.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
It also makes bugs easier to find and resolve. You win some you lose some. Perhaps by the time it is the rule they’ll be better at writing safer code.
551.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Ok, well good luck
552.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Oh wow very simple, thank you
553.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Let us be happy about this without the doom and gloom about the future creeping in!
554.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
I read their webpage instead of the first page of documentation and got a pretty good idea of what it was, perhaps their documentation is too in the weeds for the overview you’re looking for? Personally I’d describe it as an alternative to
555.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Ooh, thank you for this, I might try it on my m4 mac. Any tips or anything I should be aware of?
556.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Yeah I can’t find a reason why but I’m put off and uneasy reading all this for some reason . Also the detail in this “how we built the app” article is basically… too detailed? Like a new developer who comments every line of logic in their c
557.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Or they have different priority structures where this isn’t the developers job. Also things get missed sometimes no matter how good your processes are. But improving those processes could involve something like avoiding npm over pnpm.
558.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Indeed!
559.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
I’m so glad this was reposted as I haven’t seen it before and I love it!
560.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Probably because it’s fine 99.99% of the time and humans aren’t intuitively good at handling risk that functions like that. Besides, security is something handed off to specialists to free the devs up to focus on building things in most com
561.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
“Personally, I never wear a seatbelt because all drivers on the road should just follow the road rules instead and drive carefully.” I don’t control all the drivers on the road, and a company can’t magically turn all employees into perfect
562.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
That’s a perfect example and interesting to read, thank you for sharing
563.
▲
by
jama211
11mo ago
Yeah renders this whole article kinda dismissible imo
564.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Pathetic response tbh.
565.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
…
566.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
I’m sure if you think about it for more than 30 seconds you’ll figure it out
567.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Normal and pointless. You may as well have just said “people like apple products”. Yeah, duh.
568.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
95% of products in the world are just as unnecessary as this one. It’s literally just a random a phone bag of which there are literally many products made by other companies that are MORE expensive than this one. HN just sees apple + preten
569.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
Apple is making like 100bn a quarter. 102.4bn last quarter to be exact. 1.3bn in a whole year is indeed something for apple to sneeze at. And the ramp up is to design and organise manufacture of a whole new phone line. They also would likel
570.
▲
by
jama211
1y ago
The bigger phones have that feature where you can make the keyboard move a bit to one side of the phone for one handed typing too, not sure a lot of people know about that.
More ›