jallen_dot_dev

26 ms·

271.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
You're suggesting they should have introduced metric units (grams) to an American audience or assume they'd recognize stone as a measure of weight?
272.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
Interesting idea. I was going to ask how we know they didn't perform some sleight of hand at the last moment with a secret 1,001st probe. But I guess if we can confirm that the private key is securely and randomly generated we can veri
273.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
I'm still confused about what advantage is gained by having the validator be a deep-space probe. How do we know whoever built/launched the probe didn't put in a back door, or can change the software by transmitting a special
274.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
Your honor, that outdated Apache server let me gain remote access to the machine. I was only doing what the code allowed me to do. This should be considered legitimate use of the software.
275.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
> I consider it borderline immoral, given the type of affect this could have on people's behaviors, to assert a conclusion based on such poorly conducted research. Eating more vegetables?
276.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
How do you verify the person in control of the "artists wallet" is actually the person who created the work (or is authorized by them to create the NFT)?
277.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
>You can trade the NFT around but the current owner can redeem it and take delivery of the physical item. What happens if someone buys my NFT but I refuse to deliver the physical item? It seems we need to pull in the legacy legal system
278.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
It's worse than that. I can take the same exact digital image and issue 2 different NFTs for it on the same blockchain. Only the NFT itself is "provably unique" not the thing it represents.
279.
by jallen_dot_dev 5y ago
"We're banning you for deliberately submitting buggy patches as an experiment." "Well if you're gonna be a jerk about it, I won't be sending any more patches."