jakub_h

37 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by jakub_h 11y ago

   The things you're describing are EERILY similar to some stuff I've been conceptualizing and thinking about recently, as inspired by the VPRI people's work/OMeta/Shen. I'd just remark that... "The program i
2. 272.▲
   by jakub_h 11y ago

   Perhaps, but the "solutions", when put together in a single project, probably resemble the "30 quicksorts in a single binary" syndrome. Lots of code doing conceptually the same things.
3. 273.▲
   by jakub_h 11y ago

   Do you also expect engineers to drop like flies as they get older so that their numbers would become more in line with the number of available managerial positions? Cause that sounds like a serious flaw with your thinking.
4. 274.▲
   by jakub_h 12y ago

   Well, there's always the Smalltalk approach.
5. 275.▲
   by jakub_h 12y ago

   > Nobody in their right mind uses this stuff in production code. You sure about that? I thought the lispy approach was generally pragmatic - you use what you deem handy for your application. It this weren't the case, there would be