Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jakeogh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
271.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
"BTW manufacturer claims or disclaimers are not evidence for anything in particular and are irrelevant." yet... "Every single claim you make here requires scientific evidence as in actual studies that demonstrate such effects
272.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
(Table 1, col 4): https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm CDC Influenza and pneumonia deaths by influenza season and age: United States, 2008–2015: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs&#
273.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
The exhaled air does not go through the disposable fake mask. Disposable masks that the majority of people are using are are not for reuse, and it says right on the box "not for viruses". The "oh but large particles they (aer
274.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
No worries, Holland didn't mention God. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24046506
275.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
"There is no benefit and there may even be negative impact." https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8583925/The-land-no... Not remotely surprising. The fake masks are basically dirty sponges stuck in t
276.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Citation needed. Reusing a mask that is already loaded with exactly the stuff you don't want to breathe will cause the material to dry as soon as the user stops wetting it with their exhale, and then pass through on re-use because it&#
277.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
The fake masks accumulate and concentrate particles in the users airstream. The large aerosols they do catch are dried and the contents can easily then pass through. They are not designed for viruses, and there is no strong evidence they do
278.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Closest? BRL-CAD (1979) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=549899
279.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Anyone know of a vid overview? I searched yt, there are some hits, but they don't appear to be about this.
280.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Also, plausible deniability is a first tier consideration.
281.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Perhaps they should worship the government?
282.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Fast getdelim() replacement: https://github.com/ThePythonicCow/rawscan ebuild: https://github.com/jakeogh/jakeogh/blob/master/dev-libs/raws...
283.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Media coordination is only slightly more advanced when we go "up" one level. Same talking points; they just bother to reword them or use more effective (and hence deceptive) psychological techniques. Mr. Oliver knows this, he is a
284.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Real. https://archive.fo/tOXxh
285.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Curious people can read the posts themselves at qmap dot pub.
286.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Nobody is suggestion people go to work when they are sick. That's not new to the West, odd to suggest it is. Fake masks: https://stpauls.vxcommunity.com/Issue/Us-Experiment-On-Infan...
287.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Excellent really (Table 1, col 4): https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm CDC Influenza and pneumonia deaths by influenza season and age: United States, 2008–2015: https://www.cd
288.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Why not wear the masks forever?
289.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
There is an entire industry devoted to giving people strong opinions about stuff they have not researched themselves. They hide behind the false idea that people are unable to evaluate evidence. They will chew it for us. As proof of this, t
290.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
I don't say it lightly. The New York Times is not what it pretends to be. https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1285386153093464065 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23880201 https:&#x
291.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Curious people can read the posts directly at qmap dot pub.
292.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Diagram: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-65976-0/figures/2
293.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
We? No. You don't understand. That's fine. You can learn. https://stpauls.vxcommunity.com/Issue/Us-Experiment-On-Infan... You ignored the Q you responded to. "Which professional published best case death
294.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Ah the sourceless NYTimes. Totally just a news org. https://gawker.com/here-are-some-top-n-y-times-editors-and-s... Still run by the BBC's Mark Thompson. https://imgur.com/VUdcIou https://pb
295.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Which professional published best case death estimate did the US not beat? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23407130 Excess deaths are the only accurate measure.
296.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Reasons a [malicious|altruistic] actor might do that: You have the ability to use it to induce fear and therefore behavioral changes. Positive cases are valuable. Plausible deniability. Mistakes. Response. Testing (as parent pointed out).
297.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
By your logic we should ignore some of the most obvious psychological properites of humans AND pretend there isnt billions+ $ spent on studying and exploiting exactly that. The income tax was temporary. Right? Consider someone hired to norm
298.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Inalienable rights and differences in outcome are unrelated things, hence mentioning tariffs as protection by attack with slave labor. It's the primary job of a government to protect it's borders, physically and economically. As t
299.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
A unrelated(?) repo of material about Covid-19's source, last update was May 2: https://project-evidence.github.io/ Regardless of the source of this one, it is only getting _easier_ to engineer these extraordinarily va
300.
▲
by
jakeogh
6y ago
Regarding your fuel comment, that is what NIST found. They confirmed in their report that indeed, it cant and didnt. They rely on a weakening... where the fire was, which is a few floors of the top of the 2 buildings. The 3rd building is a
More ›