jahaja

118 ms·

751.
by jahaja 13y ago
Do I misunderstand you when I feel that you are equating creativeness with success?
752.
by jahaja 13y ago
My point was that it's not clearly defined - not necessarily to get your opinion on the two examples. But anyway, that's such black and white view that it's close to dogmatism. I reckon I would be wasting my time if I'd
753.
by jahaja 13y ago
Why is that? For example: a number of libertarians would say that the government is stealing a part of their income. I wouldn't. And on opposite side one could argue that the owner(s) are stealing a part of the workers income.
754.
by jahaja 13y ago
Alright, clearly a libertarian or similar with that kind of nose-dive into the problems of taxes while seeing no problem with the privileges of the wealthy. Regarding assumptions; I hope you realise how many assumption you made in your fir
755.
by jahaja 13y ago
But is it fair?
756.
by jahaja 13y ago
I find IRC being perfect for a desktop app, when I tried this previously I just found myself constantly forgetting about it and closing it just as another tab. Anyway, it's a great service but I just can't get it to fit my usage p
757.
by jahaja 13y ago
Why can't you come to terms with the obvious difference between those kinds of property? For some reasons it's basically impossible to get a straight answer from a property advocate on this. It's not the same in any moral sen
758.
by jahaja 13y ago
That holds true for possessions, but not private-property. I think it's necessary to recognize the difference between private-property (e.g land, industry etc) and possesions (e.g one's house, car etc.). I'm familiar with the
759.
by jahaja 13y ago
Of course. I agree with you, hence the "Today" in the last sentence. Tomorrow it might be other kinds of states or similar entities. The first sentence was however badly formulated. So it's true that a stateless society would
760.
by jahaja 13y ago
Is your point that private-property is in line with how people naturally behave? I'm not really sure what is meant by rights. It's surely so subjective that it loses it's purpose.
761.
by jahaja 13y ago
Indeed. This, among many other things, can add a bit of a context of the period: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1918
762.
by jahaja 13y ago
You're confusing and wildy mixing basic human morality with politically/economically motivated laws.
763.
by jahaja 13y ago
I would say that the enforcement of private property is what requires the top-down approach. Not the abolishment of private property. e.g: If I would build my house at someones former vast private property (land). The property owner would s
764.
by jahaja 13y ago
One could argue that it's at least a bit of cherry-picking. Furthermore I would not agree with the statement that those incidents is a major contributor to the stigmatization of the political left - the socialist. That I would think
765.
by jahaja 13y ago
With all due respect; the description of that book sounds almost pathological to me. But hey, most people aren't Nick Winter.
766.
by jahaja 13y ago
It was much clearer when it was more appropriately called "Political Economy". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_economy
767.
by jahaja 13y ago
> However now I'm now confused by you clarification. If there's any kind of voting and representation, no matter how revocable, isn't that a form of government? No, just as any kind of organisation would not be called a go
768.
by jahaja 13y ago
> It's obvious that this ideal society of yours is modelled for a rather small group. Why is that? > Complete lack of delegation can't possibly scale very far at all. I have not said anything about a complete lack of delegat
769.
by jahaja 13y ago
A decentralised society doesn't mean an unorganised society though.
770.
by jahaja 13y ago
I believe that if people feel they can make a difference, people will get involved. If generally people can't make a difference, like today, people get apathetic.
771.
by jahaja 13y ago
I do sympathise with the author and I think that on the countrary, if people were more involved in their society, which is a major part of anarchism and the decentralisation it promotes, such people would have a much harder time aquiring su
772.
by jahaja 13y ago
Why? Do you believe that?
773.
by jahaja 13y ago
To be fair, the tests in themselves are alright, but I'm not to familiar with tcl and have had problems with running them in a CI build with a lot of redis-servers being left behind. As the test are as far as I've seen basically i
774.
by jahaja 13y ago
My point is that raising people out of poverty should not be used as a measurement of a systems viability and success. As such, the unfair state-capitalism of China should not be praised as a viable system of the future just because it succ
775.
by jahaja 13y ago
Nice post. I've been working quite a lot with the internals of Redis in the past few months. Adding custom commands along with the usual skimming through the builtins. Perhaps I should give people some insight by creating a few blog po
776.
by jahaja 13y ago
I think we basically agree, but your reply was a dogmatic one. Discarding the notion of political change without bothering to listen to, or express arguments. Gradual change do not exclude fundamental change - eventually. Revolution is afte
777.
by jahaja 13y ago
Your arguments are quite flawed as they could be applied in favour of feudalism or plain cattle slavery. Also, "Communist" China has raised quite a lot of people out of povert as well. Should we therefore attribute this to state-c
778.
by jahaja 13y ago
Do alot people reading this react in this manner in their professional life as well, or is this just the usual kind of knee-jerk reaction when someone suggest that something needs to be changed, or rethought, on a much lower lever then the
779.
by jahaja 13y ago
Regarding point 9, "IRQ affinity from the NIC". If one would like to delve a bit deeper into this one can find some info regarding the techniques introduced for linux here: http://lxr.linux.no/linux/Documentat
780.
by jahaja 13y ago
A few off the points is applicable at much lower QPS than 1 million, especially in a virtualized environment such as EC2. For example, I've had some issues with CPU (on core 0) saturation for soft interrupts on EC2, related to processi

More ›