jaggs

12 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   Cool story, bro.
2. 212.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   And may never have. Believe it or not the UK and the USA are two different countries, thank goodness. So making an assumption that the two will adopt exactly the same policies is a little ambitious to say the least. For example please note
3. 213.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   Please stop Americanizing the UK. ICE does not exist in the UK.
4. 214.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   >> (Tomorrow I’ll share something that might help with this problem.) Just $5.99 a month, with a $50 cancellation fee?
5. 215.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   Very good point.
6. 216.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   But then why does every new model release work great for a few weeks, then suddenly performance plummets? It's mysterious?
7. 217.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   I understand what you're saying. However I'm not sure it's that germane when we're talking about whether or not the current $200 subscription fee is actually delivering value for money, or whether AI giants are manipulat
8. 218.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   Is that true though? Having to pay some $200 a month for a max account of whatever kind doesn't seem to be cheaper to me at all?
9. 219.▲
   by jaggs 1y ago

   I think it's becoming clear that these mega AI corps are juggling with their models at inference time to produce unrealistically good results. By that it seems that they're just cranking up the compute beyond reasonable levels in
10. 220.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Great spontaneous and touching video from a young Brit who was caught up in the situation on his first day - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyxSqeFrlp0
11. 221.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Poor performance, over tight rate limits, inability to follow prompts suddenly, erratic outputs, which together have combined to increase project costs massively?
12. 222.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    This is hilarious. Great to be a corporate lawyer nowadays.
13. 223.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Two reasons? 1. Management 2. Scalability Running your own local AI takes time, expertise and commitment. Right now the ROI is probably not strong enough to warrant the effort. Couple this to the fact that it's not clear how much loca
14. 224.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Yawn.
15. 225.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Yes.
16. 226.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    How does it compare to an RTX 5060 ti with 16 gigabytes of VRAM?
17. 227.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    LOL
18. 228.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Chill? :)
19. 229.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    One problem might be that American driving is not exactly... well great, is it? Roads are generally too straight and driving tests too soft. And for some weird reason, many US drivers seem to have a poor sense of situational awareness. The
20. 230.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    The real deal for climate information and hard data. But a bit impenetrable if you're not an expert.
21. 231.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Brilliant story and so clever. The despair at having to consume is excellent.
22. 232.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    OK, so I've been browsing around and bookmarked it for when I'm off the phone. First thoughts 1. Gorgeous interface. Bad... Really clunky to navigate around, especially on mobile. Each post takes multiple seconds to parse and acce
23. 233.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Thanks, I'll take a look. For me, the best interface is old.reddit.com, precisely because it's possible to scan a huge amount of news in a very short space of time. I don't need fancy white space, large images and other stuff
24. 234.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    This is really nice. Love the interface, although I would suggest a super compact mode for those who scan feeds fast. I've applied for waitlist.
25. 235.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    LOL I wish I wrote it. Nah, it's some dude in Sri Lanka, which is nowhere near me. And it works perfectly on my low grade Windows PC. Are you using a potato? :) [edit: oh and if you're looking for my agenda, I'm really gettin
26. 236.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Hmm yet another subscription. I prefer products like SpeechPulse which is 'pay once'. And reasonably priced too. https://speechpulse.com/
27. 237.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    I think what most commenters are missing is the fact that we now live in an age where it is trivially easy to heavily market to kids on social media like tiktok etc. I think this is similar to why we ban sales of cigarettes to the under age
28. 238.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    Are viruses alive?
29. 239.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    'Intentionally sabotage' a country by preparing for climate catastrophe is such a cute way of phrasing things. :) What part of rising seas, lost coastlines, destroyed harvests and massive flooding and fires don't you folks un
30. 240.▲
    by jaggs 1y ago

    This article says that people want to contribute to climate action more than policy makers realise. That's a good sign.