jaggs

59 ms·

901.
by jaggs 4y ago
Thank goodness
902.
by jaggs 4y ago
This is a staggeringly, monumentally stupid thing to do. Not only is it arrogant in the extreme, but also politically dangerous. Who gets the right to inject aerosols into the stratosphere of another continent?
903.
by jaggs 4y ago
Wow. I didn't read the article, but this 'feels like x'. Spectacular!
904.
by jaggs 4y ago
It would be interesting to learn more about where OSM is now, and how Overture is likely to affect the situation.
905.
by jaggs 4y ago
Trying to correlate climate change with GDP per capita is rather like trying to connect the performance of a car with the color of the passenger seats.
906.
by jaggs 4y ago
Also not an expert, but from what I can tell, the difference is, as you say, processing power. But also the instant accessibility of huge gobs of data which can be used to train the models on which these ML systems rely. So it's a perf
907.
by jaggs 4y ago
The pendulum will start to swing back. The problem is, what will replace the garbage and satisfy the instant, easy, dopamine addiction?
908.
by jaggs 4y ago
Works great for me. But how do you get it to parse longer prompts. I managed to get white_bear, but anything more won't work for me. Cool idea. :)
909.
by jaggs 4y ago
Up again
910.
by jaggs 4y ago
Nice! :)
911.
by jaggs 4y ago
Oh cool. Just used it and it's cool. Where are you culling the results from?
912.
by jaggs 4y ago
No mention of a tech stack though?
913.
by jaggs 4y ago
So true. Search results now represent the best gamers on the planet, not valuable information. It sucks.
914.
by jaggs 4y ago
Yes indeed. The SEO industry has finally worked out how to beat Google and get their stuff pushed to the top. Meanwhile the real experts, who don't have any SEO skills at all, are disappearing down the results. It's a tragedy.
915.
by jaggs 4y ago
Yep. That's because the search algorithm demands a certain minimum length before the article is considered to be ranking worthy. Another case of stupid Google, stupid machines.
916.
by jaggs 4y ago
Yes it has been noticed. And by Google too of course. The latest Helpful Content Update was designed to tackle the worst, and that update is still underway. The SEO industry response is to double down on long form 'evergreen' cont
917.
by jaggs 4y ago
There is definitely an orchestrated attempt to get this Geo-engineering rubbish accepted as a sane option. Not sure who's behind it, but it's probably the same bad actors as the denialists. Follow the money. The real problem is th
918.
by jaggs 4y ago
I hear what you're saying. But it's more than just a bad solution, it's not a solution. It doesn't fix the core issue, which is too many Co2e emissions. Unless and until we address that, we're going nowhere long ter
919.
by jaggs 4y ago
Yes. Everyone should add it.
920.
by jaggs 4y ago
What's worrying is that these stupid suggestions keep popping up all over the place. It's as if there's now a concerted effort to push geo-engineering on a wider level. I wonder why? Could it be money, and the fossil fuel in
921.
by jaggs 4y ago
The working components of the Blockchain ecosystem continue to function just fine. The speculative stuff (which is paying for the sectors dev costs) is struggling at the moment. It'll work itself out.
922.
by jaggs 4y ago
There are a lot of scientific studies which suggest that excessive EMF radiation can be harmful to a body. These studies mostly revolve around heating effects. But these studies were done when phone were used excessively for calls, which is
923.
by jaggs 4y ago
Oh I see. I think you'd get a lot of interest for an Android version. There are a LOT of Android phones out there in the world. :)
924.
by jaggs 4y ago
Android?
925.
by jaggs 4y ago
Sigh. We are. We are driving climate change. All of us. We stop driving, flying, wasting, polluting, over consuming etc, and the problem starts to reduce. As it did during the pandemic. Simples.
926.
by jaggs 4y ago
Ad hominens are always a delight, don't you think? The answer to your question is - I never said it would be easy. That's fairly obvious. We cut emissions during the pandemic on a global scale. We survived. Possibly with the right
927.
by jaggs 4y ago
Heh, that's going to be great for photosynthesis, methinks.
928.
by jaggs 4y ago
You are talking as though there are no alternatives. Anyway, we're probably going round in circles by this time, so I'll bow out. It'll be what it'll be. :)
929.
by jaggs 4y ago
The reality is there is NO single solution that will get us out of this hole. The first thing we need to do is drastically cut our emissions every single way we can, as fast as we can. This is not comic pie in the sky, it's realism. Sq
930.
by jaggs 4y ago
Tried this years ago, turned the card into a fairy wand. It kind of worked. A small problem is the fact that TFL are not that keen on people doing this kind of stuff with their cards.

More ›