Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jacobr1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
721.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
France is part of NATO. They backed out of the integrated command structure in the 60's (but still remained an treaty member) and rejoined in 2009. I think they still reserve the right to not put their nuclear arsenal under allied comm
722.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
I think the question is how does that escalate. If Putin is just taunting NATO with a few tanks crossing the border, and artillery takes out the tanks, that might be the end of it. But at want point does a broader escalation turn into a tot
723.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
So it is like a hashtable collision
724.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Depends upon the default rate. It might still make sense even accounting for the losses. Especially if the upfront fees cover the marginal manufacturing costs.
725.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
As a long time united frequent flyer, while I have many gripes, they have consistently made the app better and better without useless "redesigns for the sake for redesigns"
726.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
What we need is better support "native hybrid" apps. For example, you can create "app" that is just a link to browser. There are plenty of action you don't want random web-apps to perform due to security/sandbo
727.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Bad pipeline is too strong. But good enough pipeline + good enough models > bad pipeline + great model
728.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Even in non-ML software engineering you still have architectural tradeoffs, that while you can in part make reasoned arguments about, you still are relying on the intuition of your technical leadership.
729.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
If your data is small enough, then sure, any number of well tested data platforms will work for you. The problem something like timescale tries to solve is dealing with "high cardinality." When you have many unique values the inde
730.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
We are so weird about this. We already have national "identifier" - the social security number. Pretty much everyone must use it because of both social security and taxes, but also due to private use cases. We should just admit th
731.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
I suspect (without any data) that laptop use dominates external monitors among the post-2020 WFH crowd.
732.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
This isn't relevant to the question you raise - but as an accounting matter - plenty of "keep the lights on" type engineering work is almost certainly identified as R&D in those figures. I suspect there is much smaller am
733.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
I suspect there is something about the social dynamics of a small community vs. a widely used public network. Social network platforms (used loosely) have had this issue for a long time - consider "eternal september" and usenet. R
734.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
> Can that not be arranged? It can, and some companies are fine with that. The challenge is that even with companies that find that arrangement acceptable, many of them aren't willing to pay more for the relevant experience. They wa
735.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Hoover was a dominant brand in the US, but never fully generalized. So when you say hoover, many people in the US (especially when used in context, like "I need to hoover the carpet") will probably get what you are saying. My wife
736.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
> there's stuff they had we still can't do I'm skeptical, how would we know that? Are there vague inscriptions of things like Fermat's margin notes that imply missing knowledge?
737.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
You are missing a third category: argument. That is to say a series of deductions starting from facts and sometimes values. The values might be opinions, but often attempts are made to use widely held opinions such that agreement can be ass
738.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
There are two parts to this 1) willingness to challenge the status quo 2) intellectual humility enough to seek to understand why the status quo exists. There is some conflation of these two concepts in the comment threads.
739.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Right, and then we bought the thing. Who is the stupid one now ;)
740.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
This is one of the things I love about open source software. When I want or need to, I can attempt to modify something to better suit the behavior I want. Some fraction of the time it ends up being too much effort, or I learn that my idea d
741.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
They already do have their own lists. The request has more to do with getting legal cover.
742.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
That is one my my complaints. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't also ensure competitive markets. But it isn't so much that the regulation is designed to protect the incumbent, it is: - the volume of regulations requires a c
743.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
I want substack to have some kind of overall subscription where I can allocate my overall subscription spend to the newsletters, rather than having a per-newsletter fee. Maybe something like Kindle's system that has some kind page-read
744.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
> Are we hoping then, by hiking the cost, it ushers in a new discovery of lower cost energy, with fewer externalities Not just discovery. We already have plenty of measure to either use energy more efficiently (such as improved insulatio
745.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
This happened to me early on in programming career. Coming out university I had a highly customized emacs environment, that I regularly tweaked. But then on my first job, while I could use emacs on my workstation, our production systems wer
746.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Having dealt with 2 PE exists, rarely is the proposal something as upfront and silly as slash everyones pay. That probably does happen for a company being restructured in the red, but the more subtle actions tend to be things like: * Comp b
747.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
So there are two levels of tradeoffs: 1) The requirements themselves. These are different for consumer vs employee type scenarios. So general, I'd prefer we err on the side of DRM free for things like media, but there are legitimate co
748.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
Or we could better adopt secure/confidential computing enclaves. This would allow the organization to have control over the silo'd apps and validate some degree of security (code tampering, memory encryption, etc) but not need to
749.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
What about some kind of fraud/false-advertising catch-all? Do we really need to wait for popularity in order to have a more generic regulation? There are multiple ways to come at the problem, we could just say that the species origin o
750.
▲
by
jacobr1
5y ago
I read about some schools that offer hybrid physics+calculus classes for exactly that reason. Why even bother to separate the subjects. Other schools have experimented with this like project based learning - build a robot or whatever - and
More ›